What Are the Different Marine Corps Officer Jobs?

The professionalization of officers means that the organizational structure and equipment technology of the army have reached a certain level of modernization, and the quality of the officers and the arrangement of the team structure. The professionalization of military officers began in the early 19th century. It was determined by the following three factors: first, the accelerated development of military technology; second, the emergence of a large number of troops; and third, the consolidation of the capitalist democratic system. Proposed occupational requirements.

Officer professionalism

^[1]

The official formation of modern professional officers began in the 19th century with Napoleon and Prussian armies of France. The conditions for its production are mainly four aspects:

Changes in staffing needs

As the technical structure of the standing arms and equipment and the organizational structure of the army become more and more complex, the army particularly needs a large number of highly qualified officers who specialize in military occupations, which has made outstanding members of different identities into the ranks of officers;

The need for changing knowledge and skills

With the development of modern education and the improvement of military education functions, there are regular military vocational schools and military theoretical textbooks, which can continuously meet the professional knowledge and skills requirements of military officers;

The need for changing social status

The continuous improvement of the modern state system has provided a guarantee for the professional occupation of military officers to obtain social legal status;

The need for economic development

With the development of the western capitalist economy, the country has sufficient financial resources to support the professional material needs of military officers.

Competent

On the basis of adhering to Chinese characteristics, we must also look at the laws of modern army building from a world perspective. The modern professional officer system has been established in western countries for more than 200 years. Officers in NATO member states have been fully professionalized, and soldiers in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and other countries have also been professionalized. It can be said that western developed countries have formed a relatively complete system in terms of military officer occupational management models, military officer posts and hierarchical structure management methods, systematic training, and strict selection management mechanisms. These systems are methodological and technical, and our military can also learn from them.

The purpose of establishing a professional system for officers with Chinese characteristics is to ensure the effective fulfillment of our military's historical mission in terms of functions and tasks, and to promote the all-round development of officers and soldiers in humanistic care. Focusing on these two goals, in the 30 years of reform and opening up, our army has carried out fruitful explorations and introduced a series of regulations such as the Regulations on Active Service Officers, the Regulations on Military Ranks, the Provisional Regulations on Civilian Cadres, and the Law on Active Officers. The laws and regulations have made good institutional preparations for the establishment of a professional army of military officers.

In order to promote the construction of the professional system of officers under new historical conditions, we must start with reforming the system and methods, and in accordance with the principles of ensuring that the officer team has a reasonable structure, excellent quality, consistent management, smooth development, stable main body, and orderly flow, we must explore compliance with modern officers Institutional arrangements required by the law of professionalism. The first is to optimize the structure of the officer ranks, assigning administrative command officers and professional and technical officers according to positions to distinguish between civilian and military personnel; the second is to establish a "class-level" job classification system, which fundamentally breaks the "job-level" "grade classification" System, change the "job standard" various disadvantages such as over-provisioning and high-provisioning to improve treatment, highlight the evaluation of military ranks on officers, and improve the professional characteristics of officers. The third is to improve the vocational education and training system for military officers, and establish a continuum education system for vocational officers with a "trinity" of basic education, professional military vocational education, and job training. The fourth is to establish a set of fair and just officer evaluation and selection and promotion systems, make objective and accurate evaluations of officers' ethics, talents, performance, and performance, and promote those outstanding and potential officers to positions required for army building. Fifth, establish and adjust the officer service system, stipulate the rank promotion period, adapt to the requirements of the market economy, reform the method of officer retirement and placement, and effectively build a relatively stable and high-quality officer team. The sixth is to adjust and improve the military service system, establish a salary and welfare treatment system that is consistent with the professionalization of military officers, reasonably determine the allowance standards, and form a scientific capital increase mechanism to meet the professional material needs of military officers, create an excellent environment for military officers' growth, and attract Excellent social talents are engaged in the profession of officers.