What Is a Medicaid Annuity?

The newly released "383" reform plan puts the integrity pension system on the agenda. In terms of positioning, it is in the name of the reform of the government administrative management system, which is the first of the eight key reform areas, alongside the adjustment of government functions and reduction of administrative approval. From the perspective of functions, the establishment of a clean annuity is an important link in the reform of the salary system for public officials. The former was supported by the revenue growth mechanism of government departments, and later it was accelerated by officials' announcement of personal property progress.

Civil Service Integrity Annuity

Right!

The newly released "383" reform plan puts the integrity pension system on the agenda. In terms of positioning, it is in the name of the reform of the government administrative management system, which is the first of the eight key reform areas, alongside the adjustment of government functions and reduction of administrative approval. From the perspective of functions, the establishment of a clean annuity is an important link in the reform of the salary system for public officials. The former was supported by the revenue growth mechanism of government departments, and later it was accelerated by officials' announcement of personal property progress.

Chinese name

Civil Service Integrity Annuity

Specific meaning

One is integrity, and the other is diligence

cause

Keeping integrity clean is justified

Receiving condition

With regard to the anti-corruption system, the report proposes

A clean annuity should not be turned into a welfare. It should also be an anti-corruption system that allows officials to "not be greedy, dare not be greedy, and unwilling to be greedy".

.

The plan outlines a detailed "road map" for reforms, and proposes the establishment of an honest pension system-public officers who have made no major mistakes or found no corrupt behavior can receive a clean pension after retirement. The "383" reform plan is very ambitious, and many of its formulations are "large-scale". Many topics that have been hotly debated by public opinion have been reflected in the plan; however, the media and the public are most concerned about "Civil Service Integrity Annuity System". A few days ago, Yin Chengji, a spokesman for the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, said that the dual-track pension system would be gradually resolved and a professional annuity in line with the characteristics of institutions and institutions would be established. Obviously, a clean and honest pension system for civil servants is likely to be established to merge the two-track pension system.

Some comments pointedly pointed out that the establishment of occupational annuities in line with the characteristics of government institutions and public institutions, like the supplementary medical subsidy after the public medical reform, is to establish a new dual track in the name of merger, so that the dual track system will continue to exist as a new skin. Such a question is very reasonable: Why do reforms involving a small number of vested interests always require such a "ransom" approach? Why is the "fairness" that has been greeted by public opinion often changed after being blocked, but it is often only "new" Bottled old wine "?

.

First, the establishment of a clean annuity must be based on the transparency of property. The reason is very simple. If even the property is not made public, and if the public does not even know the employment situation of their children, what can they prove to be "corrupt"? The so-called "no corruption has been found" is actually very similar to the "crime of unknown source of huge amount of property" On the issue of anti-corruption, it should not be regarded as incorruptible as long as "no corruption is found", but it should be that anyone who refuses to prove incorruptibility has public suspicion of corruption.
Second, the establishment of a clean annuity must be based on the premise that pensions are fully integrated. Since the establishment of a clean annuity system, the pension of the government as a privilege must be completely abolished. Civil servants and ordinary people enjoy the same social security rights and perform the same social security obligations. Social security contributions are paid by the public servants as much as they pay, and public pensions are taken by the public. Take as many civil servants as you want. .

Both Singapore and Hong Kong have implemented an honesty pension system. Civil servants who are honest and diligent can receive a large amount of honest money after retirement (for example, Hong Kong is about 4 million to 5 million Hong Kong dollars). However, if corruption is found during the service of civil servants, this The money will be cancelled in order to dissolve public officials' corrupt motives. Our country tried this system in Jiangmen, but it has stopped in practice.
If China implements an honest pension system for civil servants, it will indeed play a role in curbing corruption and diligent administration of public officials, but there are several issues that need attention in implementation.
First, what is the number of clean annuities? If the cost is set too high, it will be a great burden and expense for government finances, and it may be difficult for the public to accept. But if the money is small, it will be difficult to play a role in defusing corruption. For example, suppose that a public employee's salary is 5,000 yuan, and the proportion of honesty annuity is 10% of personal salary + 10% of financial subsidy salary. Then, his monthly integrity annuity is 1,000 yuan and 12,000 yuan a year. Reasonable growth. After 30 years, he can receive a clean government annuity of about 500,000 yuan after retirement. This amount is far from the current practice in Hong Kong and Singapore, and it will not have a significant effect on curbing corruption in the public sector.
Second, when will this fee be paid? The foreign approach is that public officials can only receive this large amount of money after retirement, but in fact, the most important time for public officers is not necessarily after retirement. For example, some public officials have suggested that when he is 40-50 years old, he needs the most money, but he cannot get the money at this age, and it will not make much sense for them to pay the money after retirement.

The clean pension system was proposed in the "383" reform plan of the Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee. The general report of the "383" reform plan states that a clean annuity system has been established, and public officials who have made no major mistakes or found no corrupt behavior can only receive it after retirement. In May 2013, Zhang Jianming, the former deputy director of the Endowment Insurance Department of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, said in Hainan that China is exploring the establishment of a clean government annuity system for civil servants.

Mao Zhaohui believes that an honest pension for civil servants should include two meanings, one is integrity, and the other is diligence. Only when a civil servant meets these two conditions can he receive it. At present, the salary of civil servants in our country is not too high, and many corruptions are on-demand corruptions. If an annuity system is implemented, it will play a role in promoting the integrity of civil servants. Secondly, the incentive mechanism for civil servants in China is relatively simple. Basically, there is only a channel for promotion. If this system is really implemented, it can also play a role in promoting the hard work of civil servants.

As a public official, maintaining integrity is perfectly natural. But in fact, it is impossible for any country in the world to keep every public official clean. Therefore, it has become a common practice in all countries to ensure rewards and punish corruption through related systems. As a countermeasure against corruption in our country, it seems reasonable to establish a clean annuity system. In addition, we will take the lead in starting from the leadership of the public sector and state-owned enterprises and newly promoted cadres, and accelerate the official announcement of personal property progress.
The report proposes a substantial and substantial reduction in administrative examination and approval. For projects that still need to be examined and approved, the time limit for examination and approval is required. Failure to approve them is considered as consent. In addition, it is necessary to establish a system of accountability for major mistakes in examination and approval matters, and those responsible for major losses caused by improper examination and approval shall be investigated.

With regard to the anti-corruption system, the report proposes that a clean annuity system should be established so that public officials can only receive retirement after they have made no major mistakes or found corruption.

Both Singapore and Hong Kong have implemented an honesty pension system. Civil servants who are honest and diligent can receive a large amount of honest money after retirement (for example, Hong Kong is about 4 million to 5 million Hong Kong dollars). The money will be cancelled in order to dissolve public officials' corrupt motives. Our country tried this system in Jiangmen, but it has stopped in practice.
Mao Zhaohui, director of the Integrity Research Center of Renmin University of China, who was interviewed by Nandu reporters, said yesterday that if China implements an honest pension system for civil servants, it will indeed play a role in suppressing corruption and diligent administration of public officials, but there are several issues that need attention in implementation. If the cost is set too high, it will be a great burden and expense for government finances, and it may be difficult for the public to accept. But if the money is small, it will be difficult to play a role in defusing corruption.
For example, suppose that a public employee's salary is 5,000 yuan, and the proportion of honesty annuity is 10% of personal salary + 10% of financial subsidy salary. Then, his monthly integrity annuity is 1,000 yuan and 12,000 yuan a year. Reasonable growth. After 30 years, he can receive a clean government annuity of about 500,000 yuan after retirement. This amount is very different from the practices in Hong Kong and Singapore, and it will not have a significant effect on curbing corruption in the public sector.

The foreign approach is that public officials can only receive this large amount of money after retirement, but in fact, the most important time for public officers is not necessarily after retirement. For example, some public officials have suggested that when he is 40-50 years old, he needs the most money, but he cannot get the money at this age, and it will not make much sense for them to pay the money after retirement.