What Does an Examination Supervisor Do?
Supervisor evaluation refers to the appraisal of subordinate employees by superior supervisors. This top-down evaluation, because the main body of the evaluation is the leader of the evaluation, can accurately reflect the actual situation of the person being evaluated, and can also eliminate the psychologically unnecessary pressure on the person being evaluated, but it is sometimes subject to the leadership of the person in charge. Due to the influence of subjective factors such as negligence, prejudice, and affection.
Supervisor evaluation
Right!
- Chinese name
- Supervisor evaluation
- Foreign name
- Supervisor evaluation
- Main body
- Executive leader
- Function
- Accurately reflect the actual situation of the assessee
- Make up
- Preliminary evaluation and review
- Supervisor evaluation refers to the appraisal of subordinate employees by superior supervisors. This top-down evaluation, because the main body of the evaluation is the leader of the evaluation, can accurately reflect the actual situation of the person being evaluated, and can also eliminate the psychologically unnecessary pressure on the person being evaluated, but it is sometimes subject to the leadership of the person in charge. Due to the influence of subjective factors such as negligence, prejudice, and affection.
- Supervisor evaluation usually goes through two stages: preliminary evaluation and review. The initial evaluation is usually completed by the immediate superior of the person being evaluated. This is particularly important in performance evaluation. Because employees report work directly to their superiors, superiors know more about the situation of employees; superiors know the organization's expectations of employees the most, that is, they understand the evaluation criteria. In this way, it is easier to evaluate subordinates, and it is easier to subordinate. Control comparison. The superior directly commands the employees, so they have the deepest feelings about their working attitude. [1]
- Traditional evaluations assume that the direct supervisor is the best person to evaluate employee performance. Supervisors are more familiar with the work of subordinate employees and can judge whether the performance of employees is helpful to achieve the goals of the department and the company. Evaluation of subordinate employees by the supervisor can also promote communication between the two sides and better tap the potential of subordinates. Some supervisors insist on using the work log to record the completion of employees' work and provide factual basis for performance evaluation. [2]
- However, there are some problems with the supervisor's evaluation. First, sometimes supervisors may not have enough time and opportunities to oversee the work of subordinates. For example, in a travel agency, there is little actual contact between the supervisor and the tour guide, and the information held by the supervisor may not be sufficient to make an accurate assessment. Secondly, the personal preferences or prejudices of supervisors will often be brought into the performance evaluation of employees, affecting the objectivity of performance evaluation. In addition, some employees will strive to show the best behavior in front of the supervisor, and this behavior is not a daily work performance, and it is easy to leave an illusion to the supervisor. Therefore, after the supervisor evaluates the employees, the company usually stipulates that the higher-level management personnel should review the assessment results.