What Is the 'Dogs of the Dow'?

Dogmatism is based on the "humanitarian" argument, which refers to the human care for dogs to rise to the "humanitarian" level, including inedible dog meat, not torture dogs, to love dogs like humans, and even Experts suggest that in the "Animal Protection Law", it is stipulated that eating dogs, cats or selling dogs and cat meat illegally will impose a fine of less than 5,000 yuan on individuals and detention for less than 15 days, and order a regret.

Dogmatism

This entry lacks an overview map . Supplementing related content makes the entry more complete and can be upgraded quickly. Come on!

Dogmatism is based on the "humanitarian" argument, which refers to the human care for dogs to rise to the "humanitarian" level, including inedible dog meat, not torture dogs, to love dogs like humans, and even Experts suggest that in the "Animal Protection Law", it is stipulated that eating dogs, cats or selling dogs and cat meat illegally will impose a fine of less than 5,000 yuan on individuals and detention for less than 15 days, and order a regret.

Chinese name

Dogmatism

People

"Classes are everywhere, and Chinese animals are also classified." This sentence comes from a famous writer

Dogmatism

Treatment of dogs rises to a humanitarian level

A woman in mink clothes in Daqing City, Heilongjiang Province took a bus and put her pet dog on an empty seat. Later, the passengers who boarded the car were very angry when they saw this. They asked the woman to pick up the dog to give a seat. The woman did not Bother. At this time, the flight attendant stepped forward and asked the woman to pick up the dog. The woman refused. When the flight attendant asked her to give up the seat again, the woman even took out 5 yuan and handed it to the flight attendant, claiming to buy a seat for the dog, and said that no change was needed. Some passengers felt humiliated when they saw this, and got off the bus midway. (The Beijing News, January 15, 2006)

Pet dogs are for people.

Dog way

In the conflict between humanitarianism and dogmatism, the humanitarian spirit must be carried forward first. Humanity first and dogdom should be the basic rules for civil society to deal with people and animals. Otherwise, the loss of humane dogs is not only inconsistent with the aesthetics of social morality, but also impractical, which is not conducive to maintaining the normal social ethical moral order. Pets must not disturb people is the bottom line for pets in many countries. In some foreign countries, pets are not allowed to be taken on a bus, even if the rules for protecting pets are sound.

Dogmatism and humane

Humanity and doghood have clear boundaries. The ancestors once felt humiliated because foreigners set up a sign that "Chinese and dogs are not allowed in," and struggled for this, because people believed that putting people together with dogs meant demeaning people. But some people now blur this line by themselves. They call dogs sons and daughters, and give them a place of "son" or "daughter" when they go to a restaurant for meals or when they go out by bus. There are many times to eat, and some people do not forget to introduce his "son" or "daughter".

I am a certified "person"

Canine animal protection floods

Since the idea of harmony between man and nature was raised, and the living standards of Chinese people have improved, the "animal world" has contributed to the flames, and the boom of raising dogs and pets has swept the country. There is no doubt that harmony between humans and animals is a key step in harmonizing man and nature. If cats and dogs are fasted, many people who are good at this mouth will lose this enjoyment. If there are a few people who also like pigs, cows, and sheep, and put forward a proposal from the National People's Congress or the CPPCC, and protect it, I am afraid that people cannot even eat pork, beef, and mutton. Also, although crops and vegetables are plants, they also have life. It is said that they can understand music. We should also protect them and not eat them.

Dogmatism is different from humanitarianism .... people have any vision. Dogmatism is just a nominal term.

Sha Yexin analyzed in the article,

Dog way

Animals are also divided into a ruling class, an exploiting class. Dragons and phoenixes are the highest ruling class of animals, while cattle and horses are the working class. However, dogs are the most controversial. Friends are enemies, and Chinese and foreign evaluations are extremely inconsistent. Chinese dogs are generally not a good thing, for example for figurative people. But the attributes of the dog class in the West are different. The fact that President Clinton and the dog are brothers and sisters shows that Western dogs not only enjoy full dog rights, they also enjoy certain human rights. For this reason, Sha Yexin emphasized that the analysis of various classes of Chinese animals is not suitable for the West because of different national conditions. Legislative experts who advocate the detention of dogs and cats may not recognize this situation. Now, those who treat cats and dogs as pets are concentrated in relatively better social classes. Their dog food is more expensive than human food, and they pay more for their dogs than for humans. Some people not only call brothers and brothers to dogs like Clinton, they even call dogs sons on their mouths, but they are heavier than Lao Tzu in their hearts. Especially those who always emphasize the right and freedom of pets, but ignore the pets 'invasion of other people's space and resources, and damage others' freedom and rights.