What Are the Best College Interview Tips?

Interview is a kind of examination activity that is carefully designed by the organizer and uses the examiner's face-to-face conversation and observation as the main means to evaluate the knowledge, ability and experience of the examinee. Some techniques applied during the interview can effectively help us get out of trouble and avoid trouble.

Interview Questions and Answers

discuss

Interview is a kind of examination activity that is carefully designed by the organizer and uses the examiner's face-to-face conversation and observation as the main means to evaluate the knowledge, ability and experience of the examinee. Some techniques applied during the interview can effectively help us get out of trouble and avoid trouble.

Chinese name

Interview Questions and Answers

Foreign name

Interview techniques

Form

dialogue

Purpose

passed interview

For the crowd

Unemployed

Q1. Why did you choose to apply to our company?
In addition to explaining the company's treatment and welfare conditions are attractive, it can be further explained that this work can show their expertise.
Q2, why did you quit your previous job?
At this time, if you blindly criticize your previous work, it will be difficult to be hired. It should be stated to realize yourself or have a strong interest in the company and so on.
Q3. What is your past work experience?
If time permits, you can try to tell all your working or part-time experience, and even have volunteered to help the school, other groups or relatives and friends' work experience. It is best to specify the content of the job and the salary of the position. The role played in the post can be said together if there are actual results.
Q4. What are the job expectations and goals?
People who have specific expectations and goals for their jobs usually grow faster. Candidates can answer such questions: "My goal is ..., in order to achieve this goal, I must strive to enrich myself ... and I have such confidence."
Q5. What do you like about this job?
People with no work experience can answer questions such as "the nature of the job is right for them" about where they are attracted by the job and where they care. If someone with work experience can bring out the difference of this job, the supervisor will be very interested.
Q6, talk about the experience of frustration in work:
Every capable worker is bound to accept the challenge of frustration. Tolerance is an item that must be tested in an interview. At this time, the answer can be positive, such as learning from it, trying to find out the reason, and finally getting things done. This will get a better score.
Q7. Motivation for choosing this job:
Most of these questions are aimed at inexperienced people to understand their understanding of the job and to confirm whether the job applicant is looking forward to the application or based on interest. Job seekers should give full play to their work research and personal interests.
Q8. How do you think the industry is developing?
It is mainly to understand the job seekers' understanding of the industry's current situation and prospects. For inexperienced people, test their willingness and concern for investment. Therefore, you don't need to have too unique opinions when you answer, you only need to express correct opinions. If you are a transferee, in addition to grasping the direction of the industry, you also need to add personal insights.
Q9. What are your advantages?
Through this question, you can learn how job seekers can objectively analyze themselves and test their expression and organization skills. In addition to personal integrity, and the views of relatives and friends can increase persuasiveness, abstract statements should be avoided, and specific experience and self-reflection should be the main focus to make the content more attractive.
Q10. Tell us about your experience in interpersonal relationships?
The interviewer can analyze your coping ability and decision-making ability from your answers. Usually, the question is nothing more than: "What do you do when you encounter conflicts with friends?" "If you disagree with your supervisor, and you I think you are right, in what way will you accept the supervisor? "At this time, please remember: What every company needs is not to persist in the end, but to collect more information and build strength through interpersonal relationships. Find the right work decisions and methods.
Q11. What kind of treatment do you want?
In terms of treatment, with the clearest and best answer, "according to company regulations" may be mistaken for lack of confidence rather than modesty. Therefore, it is best to objectively summarize the individual's age, experience, ability, and then based on objective data such as industry type and company size, put forward reasonable figures with explanations of the reasons for improving treatment.
Q12. When can I go to work?
If you are a newcomer to the society, it is the ideal answer to go to work as soon as you are admitted. However, it is quite common to plan your career change while working. Therefore, you must consider persuading your boss to approve the resignation and job transfer to allow yourself more time. If time is not allowed to delay the report, it may cause trouble to the new company. Therefore, to explain the current situation, it should not be overstated to set the registration time within one month.
The stupid and wonderful answers to the interview tell you the truth. The following questions make it clear that you will find faults. It is likely that you will not encounter them at all during the interview. But when someone "sees" the door, you can only try to deal with him.
1. Without working experience, do you think you are suitable for our requirements?
Stupid answer: But you are here to recruit fresh college students.
Good answer: I heard that a young tiger was rejected from hunting because he had no hunting experience. Do you think it has the potential to grow?
2. Why do you read philosophy but apply for audit?
Stupid answer: You have stated "no professional", so I want to try it.
My first answer: It is said that the layman's inspiration often exceeds the layman's, because they have no fixed mindset and no rules.
Good answer two: The reason why I seek employment across majors is to provide myself with such a motivation that lifelong learning will not be eliminated by society.
3. The texture of the suit you are wearing doesn't look good!
Stupid answer: Dressing doesn't affect my performance, not to mention I haven't worked yet and can't afford a better one.
Good answer: I passed the bookstore with the money to buy a suit yesterday, and found two sets of books that are important to me, which may help today's interview, so I spent the money to buy a suit.
4. Questions about your brain You talked to me for half an hour. Did you see anything?
There is no purpose in this question, just to see if your thinking is novel and can impress him. You can answer what you want, there is no one answer.
Stupid answer: I saw the table, the floor, you and me ...
Wonderful answer: Nothing new, just that your house is particularly messy.
5. If you were to die tomorrow, what would you like to say on your tombstone?
The examiner actually wants to ask you, what kind of achievements do you hope to achieve in this life?
Stupid answer: Find a good job, find a good husband and other "wife and child hot gimmick" style "life ideals", or please rest in peace, I am a good person and other nonsense empty words.
Good answer: I have worked in many different industries in my life, which makes me very satisfied.
6. How much is a Boeing 737? How many golf balls can fit in a Boeing 747?
In this type of question, the examiner will not really hope that you can calculate accurate numbers. The key is to reflect the method of thinking, and then to obtain numbers close to the facts through reasonable assumptions and reasoning. However, someone really met such an examiner. After thinking hard for a long time, he had to admit defeat, but the examiner grinned: "In fact, there is basically no answer to this question, and I do nt even know how to answer it, I just want to see See if you have the courage to admit that you don't know. "
The formal unit interview scoring standards are generally divided into 10 aspects, with a perfect score of 100 points: personal profile, examining self-summary and cognitive abilities, including hobbies, strengths, personality evaluations, accounting for 10%; professional basic concepts, IQ IQ evaluation, Accounting for 10%; post ability, experience, accounting for 10%; EQ emotional quotient evaluation, accounting for 10%; AQ adversity quotient evaluation, accounting for 10%; logical thinking, analysis and judgment ability, accounting for 10%; Responsibility, accounting for 10%; sense of belonging and loyalty, accounting for 10%; organizational discipline, accounting for 10%; knowledge, potential, accounting for 10%.
Based on the author's many years of recruitment experience, the following aspects should be paid special attention during the interview:
A good start can be said to be half the success. Make sure to leave a confident and sincere impression on the recruiting unit from the beginning and encourage yourself. For example, you can use this opening statement: "Thank you very much (your company) for giving me this interview opportunity. If your company hires me, I will perform well." After the interview, it is also important to say the last sentence. Before you leave, thank you politely, and repeatedly emphasize your desire for the job and confidence in your ability. For example, "Thank you very much for your guidance, I hope I have the opportunity to learn more from you, and I hope to have the opportunity to work for your company. If I can be hired, I will perform well. Please consider my situation and hope for good news. Goodbye! "This is decent and generous.
For another example, when asking about salary, because regular companies generally have systematic job analysis, comprehensive job evaluation, accurate job description, perfect salary system, fair benefits and benefits for each position. As long as the company is developing, As long as the company's human resources management is relatively standardized, you don't have to worry too much about salary and salary issues. It is not realistic to talk about high, and it will not make you lose. It is a pity that some college students are now overly arguing about salary, and some people will make unreasonable demands, which will make the employer very uncomfortable. For example, a graduate of computer masters said that the salary should be 3,000 yuan, and later said that 2500 yuan is one point free of talks. I said that 1,500 yuan is one point free of talks. In fact, such employers don't like it very much, and generally don't want it. I worry that it will be troublesome to recruit him. I will bargain with you all day. There is also an undergraduate who calls and doesn't ask the company's products, technologies, prospects, or his name, specialty, and what he can do. The first sentence asks how much a month's salary. I answer: 800 80,000 yuan / month, you have to come for an interview, and you will take care of your own transportation, accommodation, and food. He took the train for 3 days and 3 nights, but he couldn't draw even the most basic circuits and triode symbols, so he had to go back stingily.
Some graduates do not understand even the most basic etiquette and common sense. One university graduate sent a personal application by express mail, but asked the other party (employer) to pay, and the personnel department immediately rejected it and returned it. Go back. (
Question 1: "Please introduce yourself"
Conventional ideas: The content of introduction should be consistent with personal resume; It should be spoken as much as possible; Keep the key points, not to talk about irrelevant and useless content; Be clear and clear; The form is well written.
Comment: I personally like to use this as an opening statement in the interview. This question is actually well understood, but it is just an opening statement. Then I will look for opportunities to understand the problems found in the resume when reading. When answering this question, you must think about the details. At this time, the examiner usually asks for several details. Generally fabricated resumes and experiences will "wear out" in the process.
Question 2: "Talk about your family situation"
Conventional ideas: It has a certain effect on understanding the personality, ideas, and mentality of the candidate. This is the main reason for the recruitment company to ask questions; simply list the family population; should emphasize a warm and harmonious family atmosphere; should emphasize the parents' The importance of own education; should emphasize the good condition of family members; should emphasize the support of family members for their work; should emphasize their sense of responsibility to the family.
Comments: This question is rarely asked, because after all, it involves personal privacy. State-owned enterprises and some private enterprises like to ask, mainly to understand social relations. Instead of the above answer.
Question 3: "What hobbies do you have?"
Conventional thoughts: Hobby can reflect the personality, ideas, and mentality of candidates to a certain extent, which is the main reason for asking questions from employers; It is best not to say that you do not have hobbies; Do not say that you have those vulgar, order People feel bad hobbies; It is best not to say that you are limited to reading, listening to music, and surfing the Internet, otherwise the interviewer may suspect that the candidate is lonely; It is best to have some outdoor hobbies to "embellish" your image .
Comments: This question is generally not asked much, and the probability of asking questions is higher when interviewing college students. When interviewing people with work experience, the main purpose is to eliminate tension and relax the other person. This question itself has no special meaning.
Question 4: "Who do you admire most?"
Conventional thoughts: The most admired person can reflect the personality, ideas, and attitude of the candidate to a certain extent, which is the main purpose of the interviewer; It is not appropriate to say that no one worships; It is not advisable to worship yourself; It is not advisable to worship An illusive or unknown person; It should not be said to worship a person who has a clearly negative image; The person to be worshiped should be able to "connect" with the job he is applying for; It is best to say what he is What qualities and thoughts of admirers infect and inspire themselves.
Comment: This also makes the interview question for fresh students at most, never used for experienced people, otherwise it will look dumb as the examiner.
Question 5: "What is your motto?"
Conventional ideas: The motto can reflect the personality, ideas, and attitude of the candidate to a certain extent. This is the main reason why the interviewer asks this question; It is not appropriate to say the motto that the doctor caused a bad association; It is not appropriate to say those that are too abstract Motto; Motto should not be too long; Motto should reflect some excellent qualities of yourself; Reference answer-"just find a way for success, no excuse for failure".
Comments: The answer to this question is the same as above.
Question 6: "Talk about your weaknesses"
Conventional ideas: It is not appropriate to say that you have no shortcomings; It is not appropriate to describe those obvious advantages as shortcomings; It is not appropriate to say shortcomings that seriously affect the position you are applying for; It is not appropriate to say uncomfortable and uncomfortable shortcomings; You can say Some shortcomings that are "irrelevant" to the position you are applying for, even some that seem to be "shortcomings", but are "shortcomings" of advantages from a work perspective.

Comments: This question is the most "harmful" of the various teaching interview techniques. The examiner asked this question to test a person's maturity, judgment of himself, and ability to learn and improve. It doesn't matter at all to say what you have. The main evaluation here is whether the interviewer really has a correct evaluation of himself, and generally when asking such questions, I like to let the interviewer give one or two specific examples, which is more authentic. Especially using the above thought 5 to answer, purely regard the interviewer as XXX, can't they hear it? If you answer this way, the candidate will definitely lose a lot of points in the interviewer's mind.
Question 7: "Talk about your failure experience"
Conventional thinking: It is not appropriate to say that you have no failure experience; It is not appropriate to describe those obvious successes as failures; It is not appropriate to say failure experiences that seriously affect the position you are applying for; The results of the experience should be failed; Explain that before the failure, he was confident and dedicated; Explain that the failure was caused by external and objective reasons; After the failure, he quickly cheered up and faced the future work with fuller enthusiasm.
Comment: The so-called classic thinking above, the purpose of the examiner again misjudged on this issue. When the examiner asks this question, his purpose is just to know how you do things, not to know what you failed. This question often turns into your success story, the most memorable thing in your work, and so on. At this time, the examiner will focus on understanding three aspects, the background and resources at that time, the way the candidate handled the matter, and the results of the candidate's reflection at the time. Through these three points to understand a person's way of doing things and learning ability. The so-called ideas above are focused on explaining the failure, which is purely a trap of the examiner.
Question 8: "Why did you choose our company?"
Conventional thoughts: The interviewer tries to understand your motivation, desire and attitude towards the job; It is recommended to answer from three angles: industry, enterprise and position; refer to the answer-"I am very optimistic about where your company is located I think your company attaches great importance to talents, and this job is suitable for me, and I believe that I can do a good job. "
Comment: I rarely ask this question. If anyone asks this question, it is OK to answer it according to the train of thought.
Question 9: "What foreseeable difficulties do you have for this job?"
Conventional thoughts: It is not appropriate to say specific difficulties directly, otherwise it may make the other party suspect that the candidate is not good; You can try devious tactics and state the attitude of the candidate to the difficulty-"It is normal for some difficulties to occur at work It is also inevitable, but as long as you have perseverance, good spirit of cooperation, and thorough and adequate preparation in advance, any difficulties can be overcome. "
Comment: Generally, if you ask this question, the hope of the interviewer is greater, because you are already talking about job details. However, the answer in the conventional thinking was "deceived" by the interviewer. When the interviewer asks this question, it serves two purposes. First, see if the candidate is good at the job, and whether the difficulty of speaking is generally inevitable in this position. Second, I want to see if the candidate's approach to solving the problem is correct, and whether the company can provide such resources. Rather than want to understand candidates' attitudes towards difficulties.
Question 10: "If I hire you, how will you work?
Conventional thoughts: If the candidate lacks sufficient knowledge of the position to be applied, it is best not to directly say the specific method of carrying out his work; You can try to use roundabout tactics to answer, such as "first listen to the instructions and requirements of the leader, and Understand and familiarize yourself with the situation, then develop a recent work plan and submit it to the leadership for approval, and finally work according to the plan. "
Comment: The main purpose of this question is also to understand the job abilities and planning of the candidate, and to be organized, and the focus is to know the details. If you follow the devious tactics described in the train of thought, the interviewer will consider avoiding the problem, if you have guided several times, it is still avoiding. This person will never be hired.
Question 11: "What do you do differently from the opinions of your superiors?"
Conventional thoughts: Generally, you can answer "I will give the necessary explanations and reminders to the superior. In this case, I will obey the opinions of the superior." If you are interviewing the general manager, and the position you are applying for is another One manager, who was not present at the time, could answer: "For non-principles, I will obey the opinions of my superiors, and for major issues that concern the interests of the company, I hope to reflect to higher-level leaders."
Comment: The standard answer to this question is idea 1. If you use 2 to answer, you will definitely die. You haven't figured out how to change the internal situation of the company. You want to make a small report first. No one likes this.
Question 12: "Why should we hire you?"
Conventional ideas: Candidates are best to answer from the perspective of the hiring company; Recruiting companies generally recruit candidates who are basically qualified, interested in this job, and have sufficient confidence; Such as "I am qualified The company's recruitment conditions are fully qualified for this job based on my current skills, high sense of responsibility, good adaptability and learning ability. I very much hope to serve your company. If your company gives me this opportunity, I will definitely Can be a pillar of your company! "
Comments: The answer in the train of thought is okay.
Question 13: "You are a fresh graduate and lack experience. How can you do this job?"
Conventional ideas: If the recruiting unit raises this question with the candidates of the graduates, it means that the recruitment company does not really care about "experience", the key depends on how the candidate answers; The answer to this question should reflect the candidate's Sincere, resourceful, decisive, and dedicated; For example, "as a fresh graduate, there will be a lack of work experience, so I have been using various opportunities to do part-time jobs in this industry during my studies. I also found that the actual work is far away It is richer and more complex than books. But I have a strong sense of responsibility, adaptability and learning ability, and I am more diligent. Therefore, I can successfully complete various tasks in part-time work, and the experience I have gained from it has benefited me a lot. Please Your company is assured that the school experience and part-time work experience make me qualified for this position. "
Comments: The answer to this question is acceptable. It is better to highlight your ability to endure hardships and adaptability and your ability to learn (not your academic performance).
Question 14: "What kind of superior do you want to work with?"
Conventional thoughts: Candidates' consciousness of self-requirement can be judged by the applicant's "hope" to their superiors, which is both a trap and an opportunity; It is best to avoid specific hopes of superiors and talk more about their own Requirements; As a newcomer who has just entered the society, I should ask myself to become familiar with the environment and adapt to the environment as soon as possible, instead of making any demands on the environment, as long as I can use my expertise to comment: This question is better The answer is that I hope that my superiors can give me more guidance in my work and immediately point out the errors in my work. In short, there will be no major omissions in terms of superior guidance.
Question 15: "What was your reason for leaving the previous company?"
Conventional thinking: The most important thing is: the applicant should convince the recruiting unit that the "reason for leaving" in the past unit does not exist in the recruiting unit; avoid saying "the reason for leaving" too detailed, Too specific; Can not be mixed with subjective negative feelings, such as "too hard", "complex interpersonal relationship", "too chaotic management", "the company does not value talent", "the company excludes our and so on employees"; Do not evade or avoid, such as "want to change the environment", "personal reasons", etc .; can not involve their negative personality traits, such as dishonesty, laziness, lack of responsibility, not easy-going, etc .; try to explain the reasons for the application Related personal examples: Relevant examples: For example, "I left because the company closed down; I have worked in the company for more than three years and have deep feelings; Since last year, due to the sudden changes in the market situation, the company's situation has changed dramatically; to I feel sorry for this step at the moment, but I have to face the show and rediscover the stage that can show my ability. "The same interview question is not only one answer, but One answer is not valid in any interview situation, after the key candidates to master the law, the specific circumstances of the interview conducted grasp consciously try to figure out the psychological background of the interviewer to ask questions, and then match up.
Comment: Don't use salary as a reason, unless it is too low or the first job. "Development" has been heard too much by examiners. The reason for leaving should be designed based on everyone's true reason for leaving, but it must be sincere when responding. When I really can't think of it, my home in the field can be said to be because of something at home, and I have to take a few months off. The company can't grant leave, so I resign. This answer is generally acceptable to interviewers.

Some questions are encountered during interviews at various companies. Do you know how to respond to the most decent?
Why do you want to join this company?
Wrong: The company has many training opportunities. I want to study hard.
Analysis: Are you here to learn? So why should I pay you? The correct answer is, don't just talk about how much you want the company to provide you with benefits, training, but let the other party feel that you can create value for the company.
What do you think you are suitable for?
Wrong: I can do anything as long as the company needs it.
Analysis: You can do anything? What do you want me to do? You have to make people feel like you have ambitions, but you also have to be down to earth. What do you think is most suitable for you to tell others honestly, empty words such as "obedience need" have the opposite effect.
What is your expectation on salary?
Wrong: Hasty answer.
Analysis: It is a taboo for recent college students to talk about salary in the interview. From the perspective of general large companies, inexperienced college students are not eligible for salary. Moreover, the starting salaries of the newcomers are the same. If you talk about it, they will not give you a raise, but will cause resentment. Even if the other person asks your salary expectations, you should be cautious, or simply use the words "I believe the company will recognize the value of my work" or something.
Now you can ask me any questions about the company. Wrong: How much money can I get? Is a company your branch?
Analysis: The issue of salary has been discussed before. It's even more low-level to ask "A company doesn't make a circle with you", these basic conditions should be understood in advance. As soon as you ask the exit, the interviewer basically concludes that he will not make a circle with you in the future. The good question is: Based on your personal experience, what do you think new employees should learn and what difficulties will they encounter? What are my development opportunities in the company? What are the strengths and weaknesses of a company compared to a company (competitor)? Can you briefly introduce the company culture?

Dismissing Objections During the interview, the interviewer usually raises some objections to your resume. If you can't successfully "dissolve" these objections or turn them into your own advantage, it is a red flag. As the saying goes: one prevention is better than one remedy. Therefore, after the resume is created, you should check it carefully to see if there are any red flags that will attract the attention of future employers, and then list the objections that employers may raise against the holes on the resume to find out the coping strategies.
The following "objections" will appear at any time during the interview. Have you considered how to deal with them?
Frequent job-hopping If there have been frequent job changes in your past work experience, it should be expected that the interviewer will continue to object to you. So you have to make a convincing explanation and explanation of frequent job changes. Don't be too busy making excuses for constantly changing jobs, let alone argue. The most important thing is not to blame the constant change of work on personal problems or restlessness. On the contrary, try to show the strengths when explaining, such as: "I have changed jobs several times in the past 5 years, but it is precisely because I have changed jobs several times and through continuous attempts at work in recent years, Recognize what you really do. "
Work gaps Any discontinuity in your work history will raise questions. For large logarithmic bosses, candidates who have no gaps in their work history and thriving careers are the most ideal. If there are loopholes in your resume, you must find a way to explain them clearly. To fill this gap effectively, you better say that you were volunteering, studying, traveling, freelance, etc.
Insufficient work experience When the interviewer points out that you have insufficient work experience, the most appropriate way is to find out how your current job is related to the job you are seeking, such as telling him that your experience of receiving customers is also applicable to sales work. The customer reception work is actually dealing with people on every phone call and every service to promote the company. "I don't see the difference between selling a business and selling a certain product." Let the other party feel that although you have no direct work experience, the previous related work experience and your business ability have laid a solid foundation for the job. In addition, you can also tell the other party about the general skills that you have mastered, how you acquired them, and talk about these skills that are used in the current job position will be brought to future work.
Insufficient education. When your education does not meet the employer's requirements and is opposed, you have three options before you admit defeat: (1) Say "yes, but -----" and put your experience in practice Show him the advantages in terms of qualifications, qualifications, general skills, etc., so that he can avoid the issue of academic qualifications. (2) Tell him that you are willing and happy to obtain the required degree through further studies with the support of the company. Perhaps this company is willing to help you complete your professional studies after comprehensive consideration. (3) Ask the examiner in a polite, non-hostile tone, what is the academic qualifications he asks for you and the company: "I already have a bachelor's degree in this field. I wonder if a master's degree is good for me and the company? "According to the answer from the other party, you will have the opportunity to prove that your practice in this industry is more valuable than your academic qualifications.
Over-qualified Over-qualified means that you have too much experience or too high a degree, and it is "not appropriate" to work in this position. Recruiters are afraid that you will get bored with this job and go soaring. If you are particularly concerned about the job, try to understand the objection raised by the other person and ask the person to explain the objection. If the employer hasn't explained the high-qualified objection you raised, you ask in-depth: "Oh, can you tell me the specific issue you are worried about?" Perhaps this issue will lead to a fruitful discussion Maybe I can only get a simple answer: "I think this job is tedious, I'm afraid you just use it as a stepping stone, and you will go far when you have a chance." Then it is your turn. In the submission, make the examiner believe that you are interested in the job and willing to invest a lot of time and energy to do it well.
Have been fired. If you leave the company at the end of the contract, make sure that the prospective employer understands this and not let him think you are fired. But what if you are really fired? Be honest about this, but don't take the initiative to tell the truth about your dismissal. When answering this question, try to highlight the "neutral" side: "My responsibility for that departure was with me. I had some personal problems during that time, but now I have been completely resolved. At that time, I was often late, and later took over. I was forced to leave according to the attendance record. "Be brave and take the opportunity to show that you know where you are wrong and how to correct it. To make the other person think that you have learned to take responsibility and obligations through firing, and learned how to get through the "difficulty". This "difficulty" is forever memorable and will help you to work better in the future company. You won't repeat it.
Carefully opening Jinkou. In a job interview, job seekers must introduce themselves and ask questions that must be known. The interview is the first step in deciding whether to be hired. If you don't pay attention to some skills and methods when answering the interviewer's questions, you will most likely end in failure. The following are some of the inappropriate manifestations of "golden mouth":
Lack of self-confidence-"How many people do you want to recruit?" This kind of questioning clearly lacks self-confidence, insufficient performance on its own competitiveness, and lack of competitiveness. "Would you like women?" Women are also competitive. Such questioning shows timidity, lack of self-confidence, and fears before the interview. At this time, the interviewer can push the boat and reject it. If you bring in clever submissions or self-introduction to impress the examiner, the employer will seriously consider it. "People like me, do you want it?" Now some units do have age restrictions when recruiting, and do not want older job applicants. However, older people have the advantages of being older, and they have advantages over young people in terms of social experience and ability to do things, so being older is actually a kind of wealth and competitiveness. "Would you like a foreigner?" Some foreigners, out of frankness or eager to find a job, made such a headline when they saw the recruiting unit, leaving the recruiters speechless, and they could simply answer a word, no! Because under normal circumstances, it is not that you do not want foreigners. Foreigners also have the advantages of foreigners. For example, if they are willing to endure hardships, the required remuneration is relatively low, and there is no family influence, so they are more dedicated. However, it is not necessary for foreigners. It depends on whether your professional skills are consistent with the needs of the specialty and the recruitment unit. If you ask such a foreigner as simply as this, you will only let the recruiter reply rashly and stop the job search in one sentence.
Ask some treatment questions as soon as you come up "How are you treated?" "How much can you give me a month?" "Are there any holidays? How many days off a month?" These questions are not to be asked, but to find Opportunity to ask, to choose the timing, you can't just ask as soon as you speak. Otherwise, the recruiting unit will think that we have nt introduced ourselves, we have nt understood you yet, we do nt know how much ability and level you have, how much profit we can create for us, how much money will we ask for a month? I haven't decided whether to hire you, so many conditions are offered, how dare we use you? So just don't want you.
Get acquaintances, find relationships, and set things close to each othersuch as "I know your company's so-and-so", "So-and-so is my classmate, and the relationship is very good." If the examiner's relationship with the friend or acquaintance you are talking about is not good or even contradictory, if you are so close, pulling the relationship, wouldn't it break your own job search path?
Inappropriate rhetorical questionsIf the recruiter asks you: "How much do you expect?" Some job seekers have no idea, so they ask: "How much can you give me?" It seems rude to ask, For example, bargaining when shopping in the market can cause discomfort to recruiters. Before the interview, you should first find out in the talent market, what is the current salary of a certain job, so that you know what you want, the asking price must not be too high, and not too low.
Mixed with some "foreign words", they are suspected of showing off-some job applicants do not consider the nature of the recruiter's business in order to show their level and openness, whether they need to deal with foreigners. When answering questions, half of them Chinese is half a foreign language, which can make recruiters confused and offensive. Therefore, speaking depends on the person. If the other person intentionally asks you to speak in a foreign language, he will give you a hint.







1.
2.
3.××××

3000~5000




/
7%38%55%
/

//

/

8 notes for interview Mr. Wells summarized 8 notes for interview according to the characteristics of the Belgian recruitment market and candidates:
1. Arrive three or five minutes in advance. If you are late for the interview, it will be regarded as unscheduled and unorganized; arriving 15 minutes early seems to be idle; therefore, it is most appropriate to arrive three or five minutes early. In the waiting process, even if the appointment time is exceeded, it should not be impatient, otherwise it will be regarded as irritable. Never use your mobile phone to make a call.
2. Don't drink too much coffee before the interview. Drinking coffee will increase your stress level and it will also cause bad breath.
3. Moderate handshake. When a recruiter greets you, don't stretch your hand too hard, and don't shake your handshake. If he asks you to advance the door, he may want to observe you from behind.
4. Be natural. At the beginning of the interview, the recruiter actually has a first impression of you. If their eyes make you feel uncomfortable, you can look at the other person's eyebrows or nose, and behave as naturally as possible.
5. Don't be overly exaggerated. When talking to recruiters about their experiences, highlight your personal strengths and practical abilities as much as possible, but be careful not to oversell yourself. Experienced recruitment experts can easily see through the water, they are also very good at understanding the time before and after you change jobs, and the motivation and reason for each job change.
6. Don't set it close. Recruiters don't trust people who are overly confident or overly relaxed. Some people are almost casual and overly casual. These behaviors are offensive to recruiters.
7. Don't say too much. Don't over-consult the length of work, or casually criticize a colleague or competitor. It is not advisable to joke, it is not advisable to repeatedly emphasize your own motivation for applying, and do not let recruiters feel that you have to get this position no matter what the conditions, these are not conducive to success.
8. Express your wishes. At the end of the interview, don't forget to express to the recruiter your desire to be hired. Before shaking hands, you may wish to ask what is the next step in the recruitment process.
In addition, some companies also allow candidates to answer a series of questions in front of the computer, sometimes as many as 70, to test their psychological qualities, including the personality and motivation of the candidate. If you do not answer the question in more than 15 minutes, you may be considered an indecisive person.
Although the level of informatization is generally high, some companies will still let applicants write a letter by themselves. Siemens companies in Belgium are accustomed to this method. They hope to further observe the applicant's intrinsic quality from the handwriting. Therefore, you should keep your personal style and don't neglect your handwriting, otherwise you will be seen as flawed. Finally, the signature is important, it represents the image of a person in front of others.
Practical job interviews: seven ways to ask questions (required)
The direct form is "What university did you graduate from"? Answer "Fudan", "What specialty", answer "Physics". Don't be too shy.
Choose the type "Are you willing to travel" and answer "willing" or "unwilling". "Would you like to work overtime?", "Will", don't be vague, let alone answer "anywhere."
Freestyle asks "Why do you want to apply for our company, and how do you find out that our company wants to recruit people." There is no clear answer to such questions, but logical reasoning must be clear.
The answer to the preceding question is the cause of the latter. Ask "What are your shortcomings?", "Sometimes sloppy", "What are your shortcomings harmful to your work?" Some students talked a lot about the advantages. As for the shortcomings, it doesn't seem to be a bad answer. Maybe this way: the biggest advantage --- serious work, the biggest disadvantage --- sometimes overly serious, clever yet show their own characteristics.
The test is going to travel tomorrow. The air ticket has been booked. The company suddenly asks you to work overtime. What should you do? Many students said that they refunded the plane tickets and went to work overtime tomorrow. But the best answer is to approximate the real value. You can answer this: I can ask first whether this overtime has to go to me, can other colleagues replace it, or wait for me to come back. If neither is possible, I can only refund my plane ticket and go to work overtime. If you answer, the plane ticket is refunded, and you must go to work overtime, you will definitely not be hired. Such students will definitely not be hired. The louder the slogan is, the faster you will run.
The challenge-type examiner asked, "I think your experience is poor and not suitable for our position." In fact, this is a trap. If he really thinks you are bad, will he interview you? If the other party is embarrassing you, for example, "You are a private school, reading is usually not good." At this time, do not say, "I usually read well, I accidentally fell into the private school. "The standard answer should be: yes, I have many shortcomings in this area, but I want to use my diligence to make up for this.
The inductive question, "You graduated from a prestigious university and majored in computer science. You must be an expert in this field. Please tell us about the current development trend in computer science." Some students said: OK. Doesn't this mean that you are an expert? It's a matter of course to speak well, and if you don't speak well, you're deliberately showing off.
It should be answered like this: No, I am not an expert, I only know a little bit of fur, and I can talk a little about the basics. It does nt matter if you do nt talk well. If you talk well, it makes you feel humble. In addition, when it comes to your expected salary, the answer must not be too direct. Don't answer with sharp figures. You can say: I don't know much about this market. Listen to friends, the salary is around 2,000 yuan. In this way, if you are right about your friends, you are wrong, and you are your friends, you can get away cleverly.