What Does a Book Reviewer Do?

Book reviews, that is, articles that review and introduce books, are based on "books". They analyze the form and content of books in a realistic and insightful manner, and explore the ideological, academic, intellectual, and artistic aspects of creation. Channels for information exchange between publishers. Book review is an important style of applied writing.

[sh píng]

The role of book reviews in readers lies first in its information function, that is, to provide readers with a reference for selecting books, which requires it to introduce the basic content of the book to readers; secondly, its intermediary function, which allows readers to read There is a psychological preparation to make the reading targeted, which in turn requires it to point out the essence of the book; the last is its guide function, which is divided into two aspects. One is for the reader to read Reading books provides a reference for value judgment. The second is to recommend excellent books to readers, which naturally requires it to accurately reflect the content of the book and select the object of book reviews in many publications.

Book reviews always follow a certain structural form, and its writing method always follows the following points:

Formally

Independent book review. Book review is also a kind of creation. Its creative significance, on the one hand, comes from the book being reviewed, on the other hand, more, it should come from the book reviewer's own social experience and

Although the post-reading feeling is also a broad-based book review, there is still a clear distinction between book reviews and post-reading feelings.

The main task of post-reading is not to judge the value of books, but to record the personal feelings, thoughts, and perceptions after reading a certain book; it is centered on the reader's psychological activity, not the object of reading; in writing It usually expresses itself around a certain point of the object of reading. It can hardly consider the overall situation of the book, or even just use the object of reading as an introduction, and then talk about its feelings, its opinions, and its feelings.

• Book reviews are the result of value judgments on books. Any text that does not involve the evaluation of a book cannot be called a book review. It s similar to talking about writing a book review is to find resonance, that is, to mark the sphere of influence of a certain position. It has no absolute value judgment. A good review is bad, but it depends on whether you can express your feelings delicately, Your definition is clearly marked, or you can more accurately say whether you can induce the largest range of co-vibration. "This is all confusing personal reading notes and book reviews, not about good or bad, not about value, but also" What about "comment"?

There are five basic book review models:

1. A good book review should include the following:

   1. A lively opening remark: Use one or two short paragraphs to reveal the author's name, book title, and brief information about the author, such as past works and honors.

   2. If it is a novel, outline the plot briefly. If the work is not a novel, state the purpose and theme of the writing.

   3 Book review authors comment on the strengths and weaknesses of this book.

   4 Use a concluding sentence paragraph to give the reader an overall impression of the book.

   Beginning of Book Review

   Writing good opening paragraphs is very challenging for book reviews. The goal is to grab the reader's attention and make them eager to read the article.

   Before you start, take notes and ask yourself some questions:

   · What is the theme of this book?

   · What are the characteristics of this book compared to similar books?

   · How did this book affect me?

   In general, the author's name and the title of the book should appear in the first paragraph, but sometimes it may start from the most important point in the book, like a book review specifically reviews the subject of the book.

   Book Review Summary

   People read reviews to judge whether they want to read this book, so you should let them know the content of the book. The review of the novel can give some introduction to the main characters, but only need to briefly point out some of the plot. There is nothing more irritating for authors and prospective readers than a reviewer revealing the novel's ending! Usually I introduce the first third or the first half of the novel, and ignore the side plots. When the conflict is about to be resolved, when a character wants to make a decision, or when a major event scene is about to begin, it comes to an abrupt end.

   Non-fiction book reviews should provide an overview of all important information, including major dates, character locations, perspectives, and an explanation of how the authors reached their conclusions.

   Properly quoting the original text of the book can give readers a real feeling. Look for clever, moving or powerful words, and describe the context in which they arise. Unless the editor allows you to stretch the length, in general, be sure to limit the introduction to one or two sentences. Don't forget to note the page number at the end of each citation so the editor can verify it.

   How book reviews form perspectives

   To form an opinion on a book, ask yourself these questions:

   · What does the author want to do?

   How much success did he or she have?

   · Did this book impress me in some ways?

   · What do I like about this book?

   · What do I dislike?

   It helps to divide your reviews into two broad categories:

   · Content: what the author said.

   Stylistic: how he or she expressed it.

   When considering the content of a novel, ask yourself:

   Is the character interesting or persuasive?

   Does the plot always attract my attention?

   Stylistically, comment on the author's language:

   · Is it concise, rigid or poetic?

   · Unspecified, formal, and contagious?

   Cliches are still creative.

   Book review

   Try to use novel adjectives, the principle is: in my review, no old adjectives are allowed.

   When commenting on non-fiction articles, although you must also mention whether the text is clear and readable, the content is more important than the style. Things to consider are:

   Is the author's control of the material sufficient and thorough?

   · What is the author's central point of view? why?

   Can the conclusion be fully confirmed by the materials provided by the author?

   There can be objections to the author's conclusions, but they must be objective and do not say "what if I write?"

   A brief summary of the book review

   Use strong words to summarize your point about the book as short as possible. If possible, echo the comments at the outset.

   For example, at the end of the review of Isaiah Ryder's book "The Rise of Japan", a different way of expression is added, and a turning point is added, echoing the opening point: "This clever, shocking novel Is a sharp weapon for us to resist formal academic style. "