What is the bun?

Slang term "Bun Fight" is used to indicate a formal event that requires people to dress, whether the event is equipped with food, let alone Buns. You can also hear that it is used in relation to the large party in which food is served, and the fighting of the buns can also appear in the pedigrees of a small argument. In any case, this term seems to be the origin of the British and occasionally appears in British novels and newspapers, so it can be useful to know what it means.

The roots of this term are subject to debate. Some people associate it with the famous comic book p.g. Wodehouse, while others believe that this term is actually too old on Wodehouse, which appears in the later part of the 19th century, when Wodehouse was still quite young. In any case, this slang term is widely used by authors who are trying to write in the Wodehouse style, perhaps in honor, and also appear in perfectly decent publications such as London's times.

6 originally seems to have arisen in connection with the formLing tea and dinner, which gave the highly evaluating members of the Victorian society, and it was supposed to be a tongue in the face, because of course there was no food thrown on these events. Over time, the struggle of buns or bunfight has been more generally possible to mean any formal event, often due to very stiff formal behavior.

Some institutions organize annual buns, serve a large amount of food and encourage members of the organization to dress and have a little fun. Many people with a sense of humor explicitly identify these annual events as a bun, and entertain entertainment in formal British culture, while others use more dignified terms. In the reports, formal events are sometimes referred to as bunrights by intense reporters who want to evoke brightness and people who visit them.

You can also hear someone who refers to a petty argument as a combat fight that refers to the fight between school schools over food in schoolyard or kindergarten. The slang term is usually used in this sense by external observers who want to emphasize that the argument in question is a bit absurd and exaggerated.