How Do I Choose the Best Research Paper Structure?

Scientific research papers are written based on valuable production practices or scientific research topics, and are original and original. In terms of the format of scientific research papers, the first part should be the overall concept of the topic research, including the purpose of the topic research, the summary of previous research and the background of the research, the significance of the topic research, the planning and application of the topic research, etc. Wait.

essay of technology

Right!

Scientific research papers are written based on valuable production practices or scientific research topics, and are original and original. From the format of scientific research papers, the first part should be the overall idea of the topic research, including the topic

Provincial and National

Provincial and National

SCI {[Science Citation Index] (

title:

[Author]:

(Full name of the unit, postal city code)

Summary:

Key words:

English translation:

text:

references

About the Author

Comment

Used to explain or explain a specific content in the text, the serial number is: , the comment is placed in the footer

How to write a scientific paper? Broadly speaking, all works that discuss the content of science and technology are called scientific writings, such as original treatises (thesis), briefing papers, comprehensive reports, progress reports,

(1) How to write the theme

Scientific research papers can only have one theme (it can't be a piece of work pieced together). This theme should be specific to the basic level of the problem (that is, the problem can no longer be subdivided into sub-questions at a lower level), not the problem. The field of study is not the subject of the problem. In other words, the topic of research should not be too large. Because the scope of the issues involved is too broad, it is difficult to thoroughly study them in a master's thesis. Generally, a master's degree thesis should conduct in-depth research on a specific issue in a subject area and draw valuable research conclusions.

Scientific research papers are academic works, so their expressions should be rigorous and concise, and the focus should be prominent. Professional common sense should be abbreviated or not written, so that they have clear levels, reliable data, concise text, thorough explanations, rigorous reasoning, and correct arguments. Emotional non-academic language. If a non-universal new term, new term or new concept appears in the paper, it should be explained immediately.

(Two) how to write the title

Scientific research paper titles should concisely and concisely reflect the main content of the thesis work, and must not be general. Since others are searching your thesis by the keywords in the title of your thesis, it is very important to use precise terms. The title of the dissertation should be a precise and specific description of the research object. This description should generally reflect the research conclusions to a certain extent. Therefore, our dissertation title should not only tell the reader what the problem is, but also tell the reader about the research. the conclusion. For example, "Between Fact and Fiction: The News Views of Merlot, Carpenter, and Wolff" are more professional and accurate than the "Report Studies of Three American Writers".

(3) How to write the abstract

The abstract of a research paper is a high-level summary of the research content of the thesis. Others will retrieve a master's thesis based on the abstract. Therefore, the abstract should include: a description of the problem and research purpose, a brief introduction to the method used and the research process. A brief summary of the research conclusions. The abstract should be independent and self-explanatory, and it should be a complete thesis.

By reading the abstract, readers should be able to have a holistic understanding of the research methods and conclusions of the thesis, so the abstract should be written accurately and concisely. The abstract of the dissertation must not be written as an outline of the full text, especially to avoid "Chapter 1 ...; Chapter 2 ...; ..." or other similar statements.

(IV) How to write the introduction

The introduction of a scientific research paper roughly includes the following parts: 1. Questions; 2. Background and significance of topic selection; 3. Literature review; 4. Research methods; 5. Arrangement of thesis structure.

1. Proposal of the problem: clarify what the question is "what".

2. Background and significance of topic selection: Explain why this topic was chosen for research, that is, to explain the contribution of the research to the development of the discipline, the theoretical and practical significance to the national economy and people's livelihood.

3. Literature review: Make a comprehensive comprehensive review of the literature within the scope of this research topic. There must be a "review" at the same time as "reporting", pointing out the shortcomings of existing research results, and speaking out their own ideas for improvement.

4. Research methods: Explain the scientific research methods used in the thesis.

Arrangement of thesis structure: Introduce the arrangement of the writing structure of this thesis.

5. "Chapter 2, Chapter 3, ..., the chapter before the conclusion" is written as the content of the thesis author's research, and can not be incorporated into the research results of others without distinction. What has been said in the literature review section of the introduction does not need to be repeated here.

There must be an organic connection between the chapters, in a logical order.

(V) Writing of conclusions

The conclusion is to distill and generalize the main research results and arguments of scientific research papers, which should be accurate, concise, complete, and organized, so that people can fully understand the meaning, purpose and work content of the paper after reading. It mainly expounds the status, role and significance of his creative work and research results in this academic field. At the same time, it is necessary to strictly distinguish the results obtained by oneself from the research results of the mentor and others.

The following are prone problems and experiences in thesis writing, and are the normative issues of thesis writing ethics and writing content. The following will be described in order of the structure of the paper.

Scientific papers have titles and cannot be untitled. The thesis title is about 20 words. The size of the question should be consistent with the content. Sub-questions can be set instead of the first and second reports. The thesis topics are written in a straightforward tone, without the use of exclamation or question marks, and scientific thesis topics cannot be written in advertising or news reports.

Scientific papers should be signed with the real name and real work unit. It mainly reflects the responsibility, the ownership of the results, and facilitates subsequent studies. The author of a thesis in the strict sense refers to the person who is responsible for the whole process of selecting the topic, demonstrating, consulting the literature, designing the scheme, establishing the method, experimenting, organizing the data, summarizing, and writing the document. . The thesis should be signed with my consent. Academic guides can be listed as authors or general thanks based on the actual situation. Executive leaders are generally unsigned.

The conclusion of the thesis should write clear and reliable results, and write firm conclusions. The text of the thesis should be concise and can be written one by one. Don't use vague words like "summary."

This is a very important and problematic part of the thesis. The purpose of listing the paper references is to let readers understand the ins and outs of the research propositions of the paper, to facilitate searching, and to respect the work of the predecessors, and to accurately position their work. So there are both technical issues and scientific moral issues.

There is a need to cite references throughout a paper. For example, in the introduction of the paper, the most important and most directly related literature should be cited; in the method, the adopted or borrowed method should be cited; in the results, sometimes the data compared with the literature should be cited; in the discussion, the reference should be cited Various supportive or contradictory results or opinions related to the dissertation.

All carelessness, do not check the literature; deliberately do not cite, self-innovation; debase others, promote yourself; avoid the importance of light, pretentious attitude and other methods are wrong. Among them, errors such as not checking the literature, missing important literature, deliberately not citing others 'literature, or deliberately demeaning others' work are obvious and easy to find. Some practices are more subtle, such as quoting it in the introduction and bringing it into the discussion. This puts the original or the basis of your thesis in a position equal to yours. Another example is that scientific research work is gradually developed in depth, and your work is always developed based on previous work. The correct way of writing is: what did someone do on this question in a certain year, and what did someone do on that basis in a certain year, so that the expression does not hurt your contribution at all. Some thesis authors do not express it this way, but say that someone did this question in a certain year and did not do it, and someone did it in a certain year and did not do it. This can sometimes confuse some

The mentor, the technical facilitator, the person who provided the special reagent or equipment, the funder, and the person who made the important suggestion are all the recipients. The acknowledgment of the thesis should be sincere and practical. Don't be vulgar, don't thank in general, don't just thank the professor and don't thank others. Ask for the consent of the person being thanked before writing the acknowledgment.

Generally, the full text of the thesis is briefly summarized in about 200 words, often at the beginning. The abstract should be carefully written and attractive. To make the reader read the abstract of the paper is like seeing the miniature of the paper, or to read the relevant part of the paper. In addition, a few keywords should be given, and the keywords should write the really critical academic words, not general words.