Is there immediate playback in baseball?

American Major League Baseball (MLB) began to use immediate playback in August 2008 to review specific types of calls. Previously, the immediate repetition of baseball was used only on an irregular basis, usually individual referees who had doubts about their decision. Since 2008, instant playback can be used to verify three types of calls: whether domestic ball balls were fair or foul, whether the home running ball actually came out of the ball or not, and whether the viewer intervened in the ball progress in the home run. All this is called "marginal calls" because they have to do whether the intervention is considered a home run or not.

three uses

Since 2008, immediate playback can be used in three specific situations to determine whether the hit can be considered a home run:
  • You want to see if the ball is righteous or foul: if the ball is righteous, the home rosn stands if it isThe foul, then it doesn't count.
  • If you want to find out if the ball actually left the playground or not. There are three possible results: if the ball cleans the wall, it can be a home run; If it remains in the field, it can be considered "alive" and is still in the game; And if it completely leaves the field, it can be considered a home run.
  • If you want to find out if the viewer intervened into the live ball by touching him or getting in the way a player trying to catch him. This is calculated only as an interference if the ball is still in the field; As soon as it goes through the wall, viewers can try to catch even if they get in the way of the player.

History

Immediate playback has been used on a sporadic basis since the 1960s, when the Bowie Kuhn Baseball Commissioner checked the 1969 world -class video.Rlins and St. Louis Cardinals. The Marlin protested and said that the viewing was determined by the bad precedent and the use of immediate baseball playback was forbidden until MLB officially approved it in 2008. For the first time it was officially used in the world series next year when Yankees Alex Alex Rodriguez hit the ball.

debate

Whether to enable the use of immediate baseball playback has been a controversial problem for many years, some of which claimed that immediate playback in baseball would destroy the historical aspect of the game and withdraw the decision -making skills from the judges. In addition, purists argued that the human error aspect of the game - the ability of the referee to throw a call - is part of the magic of the game that distinguishes it from other professional sports. Proponents of immediate playback in baseball said it was the only way to ensure objectivity and ensure that the correct call is made every time. While he admits that immediate playback in baseball must beLimited only to certain aspects of the game - for example, the argumentation of balls and strokes would still be considered a restriction - those who were interested in immediate play, took the attitude that it would improve, that it would be ensured that blown calls do not affect the results of the game or series.

New Development

Since 2010, immediate baseball playback has been used more than 120 times, with about 50 applications led to an inverted call. The new development is expected to take place in 2012, when the judges will be able to use immediate play to determine whether the ball was caught, fair or foul, or whether the viewer sitting behind any wall heading to the field, whether it includes border calls.

IN OTHER LANGUAGES

Was this article helpful? Thanks for the feedback Thanks for the feedback

How can we help? How can we help?