What is the research of cooperation?

collaborative research is any research project that is carried out by at least two people. Collaborative research has happened in many ways and is more common in some fields than others. It is very common in sciences and less in humanities. Working with others on a research project can have several advantages, but there may also be disadvantages.

Often scientists decide to cooperate when the project is large or involved or connects their areas of expertise. Imagine, for example, that two scientists are interested in a similar scientific topic. One researcher is an expert in statistical methods and the other has collected many data from the field experiment. If they work, scientists can combine their strengths and perform sophisticated statistical analyzes of data from field experiments. The aim of the research of cooperation is usually to publish the results and scientists will divide the work on writing results and navigation.

Another example of cooperation research is a major survey such as the census in the US. AdditionThe people include thousands of people at different levels of involvement. To make the census successful, several things must be done. There is a hierarchical structure for the census and large teams of interviewers and analysts who do work with the collection of information.

When performing the right spirit, cooperation in cooperation can lead to more reliable and stronger results that appear faster than they would do if the research was carried out separately. Scientists can associate their knowledge and criticize the work of another before starting the publication process.

However, there may be disadvantages for researching cooperation. Sometimes it is difficult to know if cooperation will be fertile. A co -worker may be difficult to work SH, or scientists do not have to achieve a consensus about their results. Another common pitfall is the fight for authorship or ownership of research. In many academic publications that is the "first author" or has jMedo first as an author in the article, carries the most professional prestige and can be important for career progress. Therefore, decision -making is potentially questionable.