What is Flowbee®?

Flowbee® is a device that connects to vacuum and is used to cut hair. He was invented by a carpenter called Rick Eddy at the age of 80 and was advertised for several years through infomercials on television as his primary marketing campaign. His primary advertising campaign is now online on a dedicated website and its popularity has disappeared since its foundation. Flowbee® can also be used to cut hair types of certain types of dogs also using a reserved connection for pets.

Vacuum is necessary for proper operation of Flowbee®. The vacuum access point must be included in the hoses so that the Flowbee® hose can be attached to it. At the end of the hose, the cutting extension is attached. This cutting mounting cuts the hair and immediately sucks the cut hair into the hose and finally into the vacuum. The extension can be attached to the cutting head to adjust the cut length. Less hair is reduced longer, while shorter attachment will be more cut. The user can use the device to ownor use it to cut other hair.

While Flowbee® was originally sold quite well, the sale narrowed after people realized the restriction of the equipment, as well as the mockery that the device received in the media and popular culture. The device does not take into account the nuances and different lengths of human hairstyle, so the cut could often end up uneven and unattractive. Furthermore, a person who cut his own hair could have difficulty controlling the device and monitoring which hairs are cut and which are not. Flowbee® could also be quite loud because the vacuum would have to run throughout the process of the hairstyle process.

The device has become a reference to pop culture in many films and television shoes and was often ridiculed and parodied. This may eventually led to a decline in popularity of TZA regulations, although units are still selling regularly and competitors even exist that are based on similar Products. System supporters report ease of use, durability and product efficiency, although many online reviewers note that the quality of the system has decreased over the years. This can be caused by rising materials for materials or a decrease in the company's income, resulting in a less robust product.