What Are the Different Law Enforcement Jobs?

Selective enforcement is a phenomenon that exists objectively in the practice of the legal system. There are two versions of its definition: one is that law enforcement subjects deliberately treat different jurisdictional objects differently, which violates the law enforcement justice. The second problem is the adjustments made by the state in trying to gain flexibility and effectiveness in light of changing circumstances.

Selective enforcement

Selective enforcement, that is, selective enforcement in time, space, and object is because

The fundamental characteristic of selective law enforcement, that is, selective law enforcement in time, space and object, this is also "selection

Because selective law enforcement always has the possibility of non-compliance and illegal investigation, it is difficult for the legal order to be fundamentally maintained. In order to consolidate and maintain the legal order, the common thinking is to further improve the effectiveness of selective law enforcement, making people afraid to violate the law and reducing the phenomenon of violations of law.

Selective enforcement because of its

To make up for the shortcomings of selective law enforcement through the role of the National People's Congress, it is necessary to fully understand the selectivity of the work of the National People's Congress. People's congresses are extremely selective in when they work, who they work in, how they work, and how they deal with them. They also have the shortcomings of selective law enforcement. At the same time, the power of the people's congress is the ultimate power in the legal system and has higher political responsibilities. Therefore, it is more necessary to have an active attitude to overcome the shortcomings of selective law enforcement.

The "New Morning Post" on April 23, 2009 published an article "Who is Worse?" It was said that Li, who lives in Chengdu, secretly loves neighbor Liu, while his husband is away, sneaks into the courtyard of Liu, and then climbs a tree to spy on every move of Liu at home. The incident was convicted by the court of rape. Li peeped at adults, while several officials in Xishui County, Guizhou Province, spoiled the young girls, and the facts of the crime were conclusive. However, the court only ruled that it was "the young girl who stayed there." If Li, who had no official status, sexually assaulted the young girls, it would be the maximum sentence of rape; if several officials in Xishui peeped at the woman, the local court might not control it. Is the difference so big in the same criminal law? The authors define it as a selective enforcement. After reading it, I ca nt help but ask: How much enforcement do we have in selective enforcement?

The highly regarded "hide cat" incident in Yunnan has finally released the results of the trial of the persons involved. Li Dongming, a policeman at the detention center, was sentenced to 1 year and 6 months in prison for neglect of duty, and suspended for two years. Another policeman, Su Shaolu, was sentenced to 1 year in prison for ill-treatment of a supervised officer. In the same case, the three detainees detained by Li Qianming for intentional injury were sentenced to life imprisonment and imprisonment for 17 years and 16 years. Due to the different circumstances of the crime, it is normal to have different sentences in the same case. However, in this "hide cat" case, the officials and the people in the same case were sentenced to such a huge difference. No wonder the public opinion is fierce. Although professionals defending local courts may say that the two are not comparable, "Prisoner" directly killed Li Qiaoming, and the police simply neglected or abused. But people with a little common sense know that the police have a duty to maintain order by detaining a group of suspected criminals in a space controlled by the police.