What Does an Animal Psychologist Do?

Animal Psychology (English: The Psychology of Animal or The Animal psychology) is a branch of psychology. It is the study of the minds of animals, especially non-human animals.

Animal psychology

Animal Psychology (English: The Psychology of Animal or The Animal psychology) is a branch of psychology. It is the study of the minds of animals, especially non-human animals.

In addition to animal psychology, comparative psychology and

Animal psychology has been influenced by R. Descartes' mechanical viewpoint on the one hand, and on the other by extreme anthropomorphism.

The core part of psychology is need and satisfaction. Any life is facing such a situation, they are interpreting such reincarnation in different ways. Each life is not only itself, but also the enemies of other life, and also the food of other life. Diversity conceals what is eaten and eaten

Current animal psychology does not bother itself with providing any kind of cautious answer. In fact, it does not provide general answers at all. However, as we have seen, in any particular situation, animal psychology selects intellectual functions from the entire psychological process, and interprets the animal's psychological life based on these intellectual functions. It implies the opposite of the accepted principles of natural science (the accepted norm of natural science is that we should always resort to the simplest possible explanation). It tries to obtain all the facts of objective observation from the most complicated psychological process of human subjective experience. As long as there is an alternativean explanation based on logical reflection and a simple associationit will always choose the former.

Psychological test

The fact is that logic reflects everywhere, and one possible explanation can be used as sufficient evidence to prove that it is the correct interpretation. However, there are two reasons why this special inference by causality cannot be tolerated. First, psychological activities are so complex and diverse that there may be several explanations for each objective activity. Moreover, it requires very careful consideration of all secondary environments to determine the actual psychological conditions of a particular outcome. Secondly, because everything can be subjectively attributed to a logical reflection, the logical reflection itself can be transformed into the objective conditions of anything. Therefore, a psychologist who interprets a conscious fact as a logic, and when this logic reflects such a provision, the psychologist behaves in principle like a natural science scholar, characterizing certain natural objects Attributable to usefulness, these useful properties happen to be owned by ourselves or by other organisms. However, because the logical reflection itself is a psychological process, it may take its place as a possible cause of some psychological result together with other processes. Once an error occurs, its danger is greater, and its proof is more difficult. When we try to make a psychological explanation of phenomena (phenomenons inferred from their objective results), there is reason to emphasize the need to frequently ask those who are comparing one interpretation to another Features of decisive value.