What do people worry about cloned animals in food supply?

In 2006, US food and drug administration (FDA) issued documents that indicate that animals cloned and cloned animal products will be permitted to American food supply. The result was a mass scream of citizens around the world who raised serious concerns about the idea of ​​cloned animals in their food. This public comment reflected the response to genetically modified organisms and other revelations on American agriculture, such as exposures of concentrated animal feeding and routine practice of feeding animals depicted parts of other animals, situations that could cause beef swing and are carried out and their illness and their illness and their disease. Products to support this claim. In fact, some Americans have already ate products from cloned animals, apparently without any bad effects. Anal fdayysed structure and content of cloned animal products and compared it with traditionally reproduced animals and found no statisticthe difference between the two.

For consumers there are several things in the discussion of cloned animals. The first is the question of whether cloned tissue and animal products are truly safe. The second is that many clones are also genetically modified and FDA said that genetically modified animal material is dangerous for human consumption. The third is the problem of choosing: whether cloned meat and animal products are safe, consumers want to choose what they put into their bodies.

The first concern for cloned animals is largely negated costs for the production of the clone. Which technology can become cheaper, so the clone is working demanding and very expensive: allowing cows to be reproduced normally, is increasingly stable. Clones are used to improve breeding: for example, cloning with a particularly perfect bull can increase sperm yield to produce calves or sell other cow farmers. These clones live in a heightChkat lives because they are very valuable animals, although biologists have caused concerns about the variety of the species: cloned animals reduce diversity, especially if one clone is used to produce potentially hundreds of offspring.

The second problem of genetic modification of cloned animals is more problematic. It may be very difficult to insulate genetically modified animals from normal animals or their cloned relatives, although because the reproduction of animals is more evident than in plants, "cross pollination" may be easier. However, a genetically modified salmon that has escaped into nature causes serious problems for wild salmon, as a genetically modified fish can still behave and dilute the wild gene fund. The purpose -leggedly modified cloned animals is unclear because the FDA has not said any intention to allow its products to the market due to health problems, but the risk of genetic corruption of healthy animals is still there.

Finally, the problem is large. Many activists for animal rights has causedThe problems of how human cloned animals will be treated because it seems that they are removed from conventionally produced animals by one step. Individuals who are worried about animals are also worried about clone rights because cloned or not, animals still have thoughts, feelings and desires. Other consumers simply try to eat more natural or healthier foods and have doubts about the consumption of cloned animals. If the FDA does not introduce and enforces the labeling laws, people may not be able to decide on their food. Food activists have warned that monitoring clones can be very difficult, nor can it be possible to accurately mark the meat onc cooked animals enter the supply of food. Environmental farmers are already taking steps to protect their supplies, but it can be difficult when several generations of descendants of cloned animals are available in the open market.