What is the law of unintended consequences?

The Unintended consequences Act is the growth of many theories, but it was probably best defined by sociologist Robert K. Merton in 1936. These "reactions" may be positive, negative or neutral, but leave the intention of the initial action. Merton also described five reasons why the "law" or amendment could fall under the law of unintended consequences.

The two main reasons why the unintended consequences Act works, according to Merton, is because framers of social changes either do not know the effect of the law, or erroneous, or develop changes that have effects that have effects that develop, which have effects that have effects they send. Other reasons why we sometimes see changes occur after any type of event, new scientific development or approval of the contract can have to do with "own interest", so much that a person who desperately wants to see change does not evaluate the final effects of this change.

The person's value system can also make them look around their system when accepting any kind to evaluate how the law of unintended consequences could work. The fifth cause of the Act on Unintended consequences is the self -harmful prophecy. In this case, Merton specifically referred to how society could falsely predict a certain potential threat to society and to avoid it, can change society in an important or drastic way.

Any action, from the smallest to the largest, can have unforeseen results. In a way, this can be expected, because even in the smallest systems such as an individual family, individuals are intensively complex beings. When you look at society as a mechanisms, its mechanisms are so intricate and extremely demanding that you can expect almost anything that would affect this company that has unintended results.

you can look at how in r rThe extinct system is found by the law of unintended consequences. For example, you can decide to sit down with children and watch a family film. The intention may be partly independent interest because you want to see the film, and if you have never seen it before you have ignored the possibility of consequences that occur when watching a movie. Let's say a five -year -old old in a family is hard to worry about something you would consider innocent.

Although the aim could have been watching the film and have some family time, an unforeseen result captures the head and then you have a child to interrupt your sleep for next year by having nightmares. Sometimes you can't guess what an unintended consequence could be. The child could be so amazed by the film that O onnebo will grow up as an actor, screenwriter or director. This is not the goals of family film nights; These are unexpected consequences. However, an example suggests that even the smallest actions may have a negative impact or change in life that would probably not consider you.

more often people evaluate, jand the law of unintended consequences works on a much larger scale. For example, social security programs aimed at helping families in economic need have led to an unintended result of some people intentionally residing in the well -being and the "abuse of the system". This led to the reform of social security, especially as was enacted by Clinton's era of 90 years.

The unintended consequence of the reform of social security was the binding that put many free mothers inside. Because they had to go back to work and could still lack training to do a highly paying job, they had to try to find care for children would be quite cheap enough. Some women who participated in the American well -being program, as soon as they started to work, found themselves in even greater poverty and the need for cheap childcare brought a disproportionate burden on the childcare system and occasionally placed children in children's care programs that were not inthe banks made.

Almost every law, each invention, every contract, and every extensive action has unintended consequences that can change society as a whole. The arrival of antibiotics reported drugs for diseases that previously demonstrated death sentences, but an unintended consequence was the development of superbugs that resist the treatment of antibiotics. It may be impossible to fully anticipate how any change in society can eventually affect it in many ways until these effects have already occurred. It is the law often observed best in backward view.