What are the alternatives to the root canal?

Depending on the patient and the severity of the damage and disintegration of his tooth, alternatives to the root canal may include tooth extraction, a direct procedure for limiting pulp and even traditional tooth filling. If the patient is eligible for a certain procedure, there are advantages and disadvantages that he should consider. These advantages and disadvantages include availability and costs, as well as how much pain the patient can expect. Another aspect is any other dental work that the patient may require. Talking with one or more dentist can help the patient make a more informed decision. Simply put, when the patient has tooth extraction, it means that the dentist pulls the tooth. Extraction is relatively fast and painless procedures. The patient can usually easily handle any pain and pain that he experiences within a few days after the progress with an over -the -counter pain medicine. Extraction also tends to states with stateiconly less than root channels.

whether the tooth extraction is the brightest of the root channel alternatives depends on the personal situation of each patient. If the tooth is placed in the back of the mouth and the extraction will be minimal cosmetic consequences, it may be ideal extraction. On the other hand, if the tooth is on the front or side of the mouth may not seem attractive. This is because the patient will leave the decision to either live with a visible hole in his smile or to pay additional costs of inserting a substitute tooth. In addition to cosmetic considerations, some patients require bridges or other forms of further dental work to chew food properly and prevent their remaining teeth after moving after extraction.

Another less common alternative to the root canal is the direct limitation of the pulp. When the dentist ends the pulp, the sealing of the nerve nerve is glue or other material. Not all patients are entitled to reduce pulp, but those who generally pay less for the procedure than they would pay for the root channel. AfterThe degree is not always successful, but for a relatively low percentage of patients who do not benefit from limiting pulp, the root channel is usually still a possibility. Direct limitation of pulp is not one of the more recognized alternatives to the root canal, but in patients who want to avoid root canals or extraction, this procedure is worth applying.

If neither of these alternatives to the root channel sounds attractive, the patient may want to seek a second opinion from another dentist. Some dentists recommend the root channel, although the tooth is not yet abscess or infected. At the same time, not every dentist believes that obtaining a root canal is the only option for a serious tooth. Regular tooth filling may be a possibility if the disintegration is significant, the alledosud has not reached the nerve and the patient has no abscess, infection or pain. In the end, the patient might need a root channel in the future, but for the present he will have a relatively painless and much cheaper alternative to the root canal.