What is the removal of the foreskin?

The removal of the foreskin is a surgical amputation of the male preference. This process is often called circumcision, especially if it is performed for neural purposes at birth or ritualistly later in life. The reasons why men are subject to the removal of the foreskin include religious, medical, military and sanitary reasons, although there are many personal reasons why men are circumcised. It is not compulsory for adults and older men to be put to the procedure because it is easy to perform under a local anesthetic. Adults usually have a longer recovery time and more complicated foreskin removal surgery than infants, usually require stitches and healing about three weeks. Men must be sure that they will be delayed by erection of any origin and also to limit Contact with the penis. Infants heal in five to ten days, do not require any special delay.

While the removal of the foreskin for adults is usually done using only surgical tools and thus requires stitches, exiSpecially designed devices used for the circumcision of infants hospitals. These devices are connected to the skin that cuts the blood flow to the foreskin, and some remain on the penis until the wound heals completely. These devices that are designed to prevent accidents in the detailed process of removing the foreskin, such as the penis of the infant, are usually used in conjunction with the limiting plate to which the child is attached to reduce movement.

In religious ceremonies, the procedure is almost the same, especially in countries with easily accessible medical equipment. Even in areas without these benefits, the procedure is usually performed by a community specialist, which is generally responsible for more than only one man during his career of circumcision. The exact amount of the foreskin removed may vary, some of them leave part of the foreskin connected. In some traditions, the foreskin is ritually consumed or buried. Removed foresters can also be used for skin grafts or medical research.

existedIt eats contradictory reports on the medical benefits of the foreskin operations. The arguments have been submitted that the removal of the foreskin causes the penis to make the penis more sanitary, which is often refuted by activists against Cirkumcisions by showing that there is no difference when cleaning properly. Reports claiming that the operation reduces the risk of HIV has also been questioned, some of them go so far that they argue the opposite case. The same claims were made for other sexually transmitted diseases, and equally convincing arguments refuted these claims. Questions of health benefits are often tied in fear where the operation is best implemented, because it is often performed in infants even, although most alleged benefits would not be relevant until the boy achieves sexual maturity.

Almost all defenders of anti-circumcision argue against the circumcision of infants and minors, as well as legally or medically ordered circumcision of men in general, but not against the circumcision of the freely chosen adult consent. Whether the operation for youLO good or bad, the question of whether a parent or institution has the right to choose a child to undergo an operation that is not medically necessary is an ethical problem.

The brightest common ground between the two sides is that it is easy to remove the foreskin in an adult, but impossible to reverse it when it is done on a child who later despises that this choice was made on his name. Medical, social and ethical views on this topic are still evolving because conventional wisdom is questioned, which often leads to changes in political and cultural practice.