Is it true that small earthquakes are predecessors of large earthquakes?

The question of predicting the earthquake and how to find out if the big one comes, remains a mystery. In recent years, several models have been advanced, including the possibility of measuring thermal heat patterns on the ground, from space to serve as a predictor. In this latest theory, scientists put holes and for each horror is no single method reliable to determine when an earthquake occurs. It remains quite constant that most large earthquakes occur on fault lines, where constant pressure from basic tectonic plates can shake the ground, rattle and roll. So scientists can say that larger earthquakes are much more likely along the disorders, especially some recorded errors, such as San Andreas, which mostly passes California. You would first have to define a small earthquake; Are there those who do not generally feel people, or are they a small 2.0-3.0 shocks that several people will feel? Even if the definition occurs, you cannot definitely say that a small earthlerThe dreams always come in front of the big ones.

For example, in California, if you look at the website of the US geological survey (USGS), you can calculate hundreds of earthquakes that do not even feel and run with great regularity. If these small earthquakes are predecessors of large earthquakes, then we should always have large earthquakes. On the other hand, small earthquakes indicate a certain level of activity and pressure building and scientists regularly indicate that we all have to prepare for the big one, because this can happen at any time. So you can say that small earthquakes can a harbinger of a large earthquake because they suggest that in the end a large earthquake is likely in the future.

When a large earthquake occurs, the earthquake in previous days is called regulations. Small earthquakes that occur after a large earthquake are called shocks. Small earthquakes do not necessarily have to be necessarily, butScientists may group the activity of the earthquake before and after a large earthquake in the hope of how and why the earthquakes occur and under what circumstances they are most likely. Yet the use of the theory that small earthquakes are predecessors of large earthquakes is not a healthy science. Only some of them are. It is more accurate to indicate that active failure lines that produce these small shacks are likely to produce a larger earthquake at some point.