What is a facilitated communication?

Communication is a process of alternative communication in which the facilitator is used to support the hands or arms of the affected individual so that they can write or refer to reports for messages. This process is mainly as a way to facilitate autism communication or other types of communication in the disability. In general, it is not used as a form of deaf communication unless other disabilities experience the individual. However, the inability to verbalize messages is only one qualification that can facilitate communication with adequate communication. The individual with whom this technique should also take some form of motor skills, but still has some ability to use at least one hand and arm. Thus, the communication is in fact a very specialized form of therapeutic communication, which is only suitable in Avelmi selected few situations. Those who can do this can find that they can undergo other, less demanding forms of supported communication. Another advantage of this FORMY Communication is the ability to easily teach everyone technology.

The disadvantages of facilitating communication are that each communication attempt must include direct contact with the individual. In some situations it can be impractical, in other embarrassing. Although it can work in most cases, it may exist sometimes when it cannot work. This, of course, applies to any form of communication, including sign language and normal sound communication, but it can be more frequently with a facilitated communication process

The process of facilitated communication has gained some criticism, especially from groups that feel that the facilitator can cause an inappropriate effect on the choice of an individual. One of these groups that do not recommend the use of this technique is the American Psychological Association, which in the 1994 position statement: "controversial and unlimited communication procedure without scientifically proven support of its effectiveness". Yet other groups, such as the National Autism Committee, propose, if it is done correctly, it can be a good tool.

scientifically or not, parents or other family members who consider it impossible to communicate with their children or others, can consider the technique that is worth trying. In these cases, although there is nothing unethical in technology, those who try to use it should understand the concerns that surround it. In some cases it can work well, but in others it may not do much for individuals.