Which type of monitor is better, LCD or CRT?
In the past, CRT monitors were the only choice for desktop systems, while the LCD was built into laptops. At the end of the 90s. The people could choose between them. As technology has improved, it is actually more difficult to buy new CRT, while flat screens have become standard. Although LCDs were once relatively expensive, prices fell significantly. However, the traditional CRT monitor still has professionals, including clarity and reliability.
have many professionals: they are cheap, reliable, have good clear images and can be displayed from any angle. Unfortunately, they are also heavy, have a large track, are not environmentally friendly and emit a large amount of low -frequency radiation considered unhealthy.
LCDS or Flat panel weighs displays below £ 10 (<4.5 kilograms), there are only a few inch (<7.5 cm), consuming only one third to half of CRT strength, emitting very little radiation and providing a fresh display that is easier on the eyes. The main disadvantage of early LCDs wasO that the display would be "eradicated" when looking at the center. Quick moving images would also be a "ghost" or create disturbing end artifacts due to a slow level of pixel response.
As the technology has improved, LCD has improved in all areas with the sale of overtaking CRT in 2003. Even with these improvements, the arguments continue that CRT remains more suitable for graphic professionals and for those who require consistent color regardless of the monitoring angle. Video editors, games developers or anyone who works with fast -moving paintings in professional capacity would also prefer CRT, although it seems safe to assume that they have reduced devotee over the years. The remaining draw for older technology is costly, attractive to those who have a budget, or for those who only use their computers, as used as a used nothing. However, the price for the new LCDS in recent years DRAMAtically, it dropped.
Yet, the competition between them ended for most. LCD monitors have an extraordinary color and graphics with much sharper text and screen that is easier to see, lowering the tension and headaches that have sometimes accompanied long hours on CRT. They are also great for long hours in text applications such as text processors or tables, and do not require screens against radiation.
The selection of a wide -angle angle of observation effectively eliminates the "payment", while the faster rate of response eliminated scary. With reduced eye head, great color and practically without fading or ghostly, good LCD is a great choice for the whole family. Whether playing, building a family photo album, surfing, homework or writing designs for work, LCD takes less space while using less electricity and emits less radiation.
Due to the many benefits of LCD, CRT has basically overtaken the CRT technology. In addition to graphic experts, the decision -making between LCD or CRT today wouldIt could have been the best in countries or regions where digital displays are rare and the application requires the least expensive option, as in rural schools or non -profit and humanitarian auxiliary organizations in third world countries. In these cases, the obedient CRT will serve well and can be purchased cheaply.
People who are interested in buying a LCD monitor should realize that standardization in the specifications is missing. The point of view can actually be larger than advertised or narrower. The response rate may also differ from the manufacturer to the manufacturer, so that direct comparison of different models can be misleading only from specifications. Shoppers can consider it useful to read reviews from people who already own the product together with professional reviews.