What is corporate citizenship?
Corporate citizenship can have several different meanings. It often concerns theories that indicate that corporations and businesses should have a level of social responsibility, given their approach to assets, labor and community influence. Corporate citizenship may also refer to the legal status and legal rights granted the corporation. The way each of these questions is perceived depends on the understanding and interpretation of the role of corporation in society.
As regards social responsibility, corporate citizenship is an important problem that companies face today. The idea of corporate philanthropy is often attributed to the leaders of the Industrial Revolution companies who have often accepted the idea of directing part of their wealth towards the good of the public. However, the opening of libraries and financing of orphanages is only part of the social concept of corporate citizenship; Some suggest that it is a corporation responsibility, so that I also hurt TS.
private sector businesses, such as corporations, are usually motivated by profit than altruistic goals. Unfortunately, if the company's final goal is the highest profit range, there may be problems such as sustainable resources, work and safety standards, to ignore or reduce to increase profits. The idea of corporate citizenship suggests that the use of work with slaves or sweatshirts, involvement in environmentally destructive processes and ignoring emission standards is morally and socially reprehensible. In addition, some claim that working as a good corporate citizen is a good trade because it helps to promote a sustainable and safe environment in which society can theoretically function forever without running out or damaging the environment over the habitable conditions.
The legal concept of corporate citizenship varies between different jurisdictemns and social theory. In some countries, corporations have a separate legal position from its owners; For example, it requires your own tax admissionElimination and may be sued by a member of the public as a corporation. Some therefore argue that corporations receive duties of citizenship without rights concerning individual citizens.
In the dominant decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of 2010, the court ruled that corporations have protection against the first change in the US Institute for the protection of freedom of expression, so the use of corporate financing political ads cannot be limited. This controversial decision is widely perceived as a victory for corporations, while critics suggest that the decision corresponds to the money with a speech, undermining the importance of individual campaign contributions. If a corporation with huge resources can use as much funding as required to pay for political advertising, critics are afraid that the decision will lead to applicants for approval of the company citizens rather than individuals.