What does the chairman do the judge?

The chairman is a judge with a legal authority in the present case. Presidents may work, inter alia, in any number of courts, including the State Court, the District Court, the Court of Appeal, the Family Court, the bankruptcy court or the tax court. In the present case, the chairman of the judge provides for a decision to exercise the right. If the person does not give up his right to the court by a jury guaranteed in the sixth amendment, it is a jury that will hear evidence, decide who is telling the truth and declare guilt or innocence. Even in court proceedings, however, the chairman of the judge serves an important function. For example, the rules dictate that each party must have sufficient evidence that a reasonable question is found to submit a case in court. If one party has no evidence at all, the other party may submit a proposal for release. If this happens, the chairman of the judge will consider the available evidence and decide whether the case or allows the case to continue in court.

There are also many other issues of legal and legal issues that the chairman of the judge is responsible for decision -making. The judge is obliged to apply the rules of evidence and determine what is and is not permissible for both parties to submit to the jury. They must find out what information each party can ask during the discovery if the parties have a dispute during this formal exchange exchange. They also have to decide on the objections of lawyers and determine what instructions the juries are given.

If the judge does not use the law correctly, it is possible to refer to the case. When the factory applies, the higher court reviews the legal finding of the judge, which chaired the original court. Although the Court of Appeal generally does not change the findings of the facts made by the jury, the Court of Appeal may change the outcome of the case and/or send the case back to the original court for the purpose of renewing instructions by the judge, if it believes that the original judge has made a mistake in its application.