Are the zoo bad for animals?

The zoo had existed since ancient times, and there were features of great courts in Egypt and China. An example of exotic animals was a long show of wealth and power and proof of far -reaching weapons of the empires. Today, zoos are focused on the protection of animal species and public education. However, critics suggest that animals should not be maintained in prison, that some organizations are involved in unethical work and that the idea of ​​the zoo is harmful to the cause of protection. Maintaining elephants in captivity has long caused controversy among animal rights activists. Elephants in the wilderness wander constantly and cover a wide area of ​​the territory daily. In captivity that you have no choice but to stand for a long time, it causes serious stress on the legs and feet of these giants, which leads to chronic injury in some captured animals.

Yet elephants in their native environment are an endangered species, severely poisoned for ivory, skin and meat. In order to protect the species from extinction, some experts believe that captive breeding programs may be the mostEpší strategies for future survival. Many of the elephants in captivity were rescued from circuses, rescued from natural disasters or removed from nature due to injury or abandonment. ZOO supporters ask properly, should these animals die or euthanized rather than place in captivity?

One of the problems in assessing whether zoo is good or bad for animals is the uncertainty in the proper treatment of animals. While in the perfect world, all Zookeepers would be ethical experts with advanced knowledge in their field and passion for their work, in fact, the cruelty of animals in the zoo can happen accidentally or intentionally. ZOOKEEPING Ethics is a complex object, and therefore many zoos use a third -party observation method to maintain high standard zoo standards. Nevertheless, because the mind and needs of many animals remain such a secret, it is difficult to find out if they are capturedí happy or not.

Studies

Studies have clearly shown that captured animals will live longer and will be more active in their native environment. It is likely that if the zoo has nothing but cement and metal exhibits, the animals will not be done. Many prominent zoos now actively construct exhibitions that allow animals to move, a number of habitats and toys and native folish. Some zoos even began to live together species that normally interact in the wild, such as some types of monkeys.

ensuring that animals are not isolated is considered another main point of quality in the zoo assessment. Few animals are really lonely throughout their lives and many, such as penguins, partially survive with family dynamics in the wild. Research has been eating that some animals will be pine for a lost family member or friend, and can slip into poor health because of what seems loneliness. It seems to keep an animalt in groups that resemble packaging or pods in the wild improves the quality of life of captured animals; Doing otherwise means fighting against billions of years of instinct.

zoo are not a perfect protection solution; They can be infinitely improved because we better understand how to handle animals. They are undeniably helpful in the settlement of declining animal species and stimulating the outlook for nature protection, but they are undoubtedly primitive in the treatment of some animals. Hopefully, animal activists and supporters of the zoo will continue to cooperate and look for ways to create the best environment for captured animals in breeding and re -effort, rather than arguing whether the zoo should exist first.