What Is a Math Refresher?

Review is a Chinese vocabulary, pronounced fù xí, which means to learn again, remember the previously forgotten knowledge, and repeat the learning of what you have learned, so that you will be more impressed with it and stay in your mind for a longer time.

[fù xí]
Review is a Chinese vocabulary, pronounced fù xí, which means to learn again, remember the previously forgotten knowledge, and repeat the learning of what you have learned, so that you will be more impressed with it and stay in your mind for a longer time.
Chinese name
review
Foreign name
To review (lessons)
Related words
Exercise
Thought idiom
I. Exam review plan
Review in three rounds.
The first round of review is a unit review and chapter review of basic knowledge. Through the first round of review, students can master the basic knowledge, basic skills and methods systematically, and form a clear
I. Overall review plan
1. Based on the basics, supplemented by the questions
Many students have misunderstandings in the final sprint. They either think that they should only read books during this time, or think they should only do questions. In fact, the scientific method is to combine the two, focusing on textbook knowledge and supplemented by practice. The same content can be transformed into many question types and angles. What remains unchanged is basic knowledge, so it is fundamental to have a solid grasp of basic knowledge. The review of basic knowledge at this stage should focus on the macro aspects and focus on the characteristics of the knowledge system, rather than some piecemeal knowledge points. However, this does not mean that you will not do the questions any more, because the test-taking skills are inertia, so do not interrupt the habits of the exam, and you should do some simulation exercises appropriately.
However, the study at this stage is mainly a process of induction and summary before the test. It is recommended not to do a lot of questions, because sometimes the questions will narrow the thinking, especially not to do those partial and strange questions. You can look at some typical topics and understand their characteristics clearly. Simultaneously train the strategies for answering questions. The test is divided into three parts: basic, intermediate, and difficult. Basic questions check the students' basic knowledge, intermediate questions check the students' ability to use, and difficult questions check the students' comprehensive ability. To answer these three types of questions, you must know the principle of "slow doing the meeting and seeking all the right ones; steady doing the intermediate questions without waste of one point; later doing the difficult questions, it is worth reviewing".
2. Don't give up any subject
Each classmate has their own strengths and weaknesses. It is very important for each classmate to strengthen their strengths, make up for the weaknesses, and strive for the weak points. Students should strive not to differ too much in the grades of each course, and to develop relatively smoothly. For each subject, the degree of difficulty of the test paper has been specified. The proportion of easy questions, intermediate questions and difficult problems is generally 50% -30% -20%, so we must strive for stable development and grasp simple questions. This is a strategic issue. Don't spend too much time on the problem.
In the final stage of the review, "several hands" must be hard, and you cannot specialize in one. Many students specialize in one or two subjects that are usually poor in the final stage. Other subjects feel that they are their strengths, and they don't read them at all. There are still a small number of classmates who specialize in their "strengths" and abandon the "weaknesses". I feel that anyway, how to review them is like this, and there will be no improvement in such a short time. After the results came out, their overall results were not very satisfactory.
Therefore, this stage should be thoroughly reviewed with some emphasis. Regardless of the subject, if you do not review it, your grades may decline. Attention should be paid to the review of each subject at the same time, and there must be arrangements for each subject when formulating a learning plan, but it is necessary to focus on making the good and the weak subjects better. It is unscientific to grasp only the good and the poor.
3. pay attention
This is a review plan for the postgraduate entrance examination, which can be used to improve the "turn rate".
Because there is a lot of knowledge in the process of postgraduate entrance examination, a lot of things are very shallow. After reading it again, there are almost no traces in the brain. In order to prevent forgetting, we must adopt the method of increasing the "turn rate", that is, after reading a section, chapter, part, and then go back and scan again, so that the knowledge is systematically and consolidated, and the effect is very good.
"Empty thoughts." The so-called empty idea is not to read the textbook to recall the content; or to read the textbook outline to fill in details. This review method takes less time than staring at rote textbooks, but it is easier to find "blind spots" in memory. Opening the textbook when memories are difficult to sustain, then this piece of knowledge stimulates the neurons so strongly that they are easily engraved into the brain.
The facts and theories in the liberal arts need to be memorized, and it is unimaginable to memorize and recite theories without understanding. According to the summary of the students, you must be able to "from point to face" in understanding; "remember the key points and analyze the difficult points"; when reading, you can "drill in and jump out"; "can draw a tree structure of knowledge structure in your chest"; The most important thing is to understand the degree of "integration".
Tree diagram. When reviewing, you can choose a more representative textbook from the many reference books in each test subject. After reading through the book, you can sort out the main clues for research in this field. For example, what are the major issues involved in the research in this subject area? What are the main contents involved in each big question? What are the key points of knowledge in each content? and many more. Based on these questions, you can draw a tree diagram to help you understand the inherent relationship between "trunk" and "branch", "branches and leaves." Then, based on this tree diagram, and referring to other books,
This schema is conceived as a one-step enrichment: places, etc., making the tree diagram more complete. In this way, through this "drawing" process, you will have a more comprehensive understanding of the overall situation of this subject research. Moreover, the review of the last "sprint phase" of this schema can also help you sort out the context and quickly recall the details.
Integration. There are generally two types of examinations for postgraduate entrance examinations, one is a cognitive examination, the other is an understanding and application type, and the latter are mostly. Therefore, students must not memorize hard-lined memorization while reviewing, but should be able to penetrate through the paper, see what is behind it, and use it flexibly. Therefore, when reviewing, we must first understand the basic concepts and basic theories, and then string them together, thinking and understanding from multiple angles and levels.
Due to the inherent correlation between the various professional subjects, if they can be integrated, it will be more effective for both understanding and memory.
Throughout the process of memorizing, understanding, and forming one's own opinion, the two specific methods of the whole process are to take notes and give yourself self-assessment questions.
Take notes. Because the content of professional courses is complex, there are many knowledge points, and there are inextricable links between chapters, so the best and most effective way to review professional courses is: first read the textbooks intensive (the speed of intensive reading should not be too fast , Otherwise there will be omissions, the best speed is about 15-20 pages per hour), then put aside the book, write the knowledge points in the book in your own language, organize them into intensive notes, and then flip through other reference books, Add new knowledge points.
Self-test questions. Professional lessons should learn to summarize and design the topics themselves. Some term explanations may not be clear in the book. You can summarize it yourself and write it down in the book and keep it in mind; some short answers and comparative questions may be scattered in the book. You can concentrate on them. Where possible, you can design the questions yourself based on the content, then try to answer them, and finally make a summary by judging the book.
In the review, strive to give yourself a question for each section, and then use the most economical and reasonable system to make an answer, sometimes asking each chapter content, so you can figure out the content of the question on the one hand, and On the one hand, you can train yourself to answer the questions logically.
Because there are a lot of questions during the exam, you should usually consciously train your pen, draw an hour a day, give yourself a question, and then write a copy as systematically and content as you can in the exam. Answer sheet ". In this way, you won't feel astringent during the exam.
On the basis of fully grasping the basic knowledge, sorting out the discussion of several important issues is not an expedient measure of speculation, and even guessing a question is not a bad thing, but an initiative to take the initiative. With several weapons, If the examination room can come up with ready-made or similar questions, and then emerge out of it, wouldn't it be quick? Even if you ca nt meet them, you have also exercised your ability to analyze and express problems, which is not a bad thing.
In the overall process of reviewing each course, we also need to focus on strategies. For example, some people like to review a course in one breath, and some people think that it is better to cross-review each course, it will not be too boring, make you tired, and you won't forget which course. It should be said that these two methods can be used, which one depends on personal experience.
"Go hand in hand" method. In the review process, because there are many professional courses to review, you must arrange your time reasonably. Professional courses and three basic courses must not be discarded. The time of the day can be divided into roughly equal 5 parts for review of 5 courses. The weak subjects spend a little more time. Once English and mathematics are dropped, they will feel quite strange. Therefore, we must take into account the review of each course every day, so that we can learn new things.
Door-to-door clearance. Focus on time, review one subject first, and then review the other subject. The review of professional subjects is also sequential. For example, in the political science major, the Chinese and foreign political systems can be reviewed first, because the system is relatively intuitive, the level of abstraction is low, and it is easy to understand. When reviewing Chinese and foreign political systems, the focus should be on the purpose of setting up the system, the basic principles, and the operating process. Second, the principles of political science can be reviewed. Its abstraction level is higher than the former. The focus of the review is the logical connection between concepts and concepts. Finally, you can review Chinese and foreign political thoughts. It is the most theoretical and the content is very complicated, so you must be patient. In the review process, it is best to connect with the background of the times in which thinkers live to understand their ideological connotations, find out the differences between them and the inherent inheritance relationship. Some core propositions should attract special attention.
Three rounds of review. Based on the information, it is effective to carry out "three rounds of review". The so-called three rounds of review are the first round of picture books, read through the reference book, and write down what you think of when reading the book into the textbook at any time; the second round combines the latest current affairs and collected test questions to analyze the importance of each part Different treatment should be used to master the important theoretical framework, which can be used to analyze the latest current affairs; the third round is mainly to check hope.

IN OTHER LANGUAGES

Was this article helpful? Thanks for the feedback Thanks for the feedback

How can we help? How can we help?