What are ethics online?
The
era of the Internet has introduced many new dimensions to a study and practice of ethical practice. Online ethics refers to patterns of behavior used on the Internet, conducted by law and personal philosophy. The great abilities of this communication medium allow the potential of great damage, cruelty and even crime. The main concerns about online ethics include protection of private information, limits of the expected freedom of expression and the problems of insulting honor. Understanding the legal consequences and trustworthy personal philosophies used in other areas of life can help one to determine their online ethics.
Maybe one of the most tempting promises of the Internet is its ability to create anonymity. In discussion forums, blogs and through different e -mail addresses, one can easily create dozens of people, each accessible to different people. One of the most permeating moral issues of online ethics, however, concerns the difference between the protoun of anonymity and deception of others.
to some extent is the retentionPersonal data on the web wise idea. Publication of contact information or financial data is an unfortunate way to attract identity or fraudsters, so users and family members are vulnerable to crime. Many social network websites provide extensive personal data protection possibilities that allow users to determine the amount of personal data visible. In the protection of personal data, many are considered reasonable, and anonymity can also easily move from protective to gross.
For example, a person who goes through a divorce can use false screen names, or provide vague details of circumstances by venting angry or injured feelings on the debate board for divorced people. In this case, the user can protect his anonymity of himself and other parties. However, if one uses anonymitoweb that provides specific details of another person that couldT for possible damage, becomes an ethical gray area.
Another main problem in ethics online is the prevalence and the influence of online bullying. Since social networks are the main part of many people's Internet experience, a brand new format for bullying or handling has been created. In one famous online ethical age, mourning parents tried to accuse an adult woman for contributing to the suicide of a 13 -year -old girl. According to news reports, the woman made friends and then interrupted contact with the girl through a social site under the assumed identity, allegedly gained her confidence and then injured her feelings. Whether this type of conduct is criminal will be a question for legal systems in the coming years, but whether it is ethical is warmly discussed.
In general, the commonly cited code of online ethics is to act in the same way on the Internet, which is personally conjured in other areas of life. While the ability to hide the details can be useful to serve as a protective OPAttating, if used to obtain or distribute information or to achieve results that could not be managed without anonymity, ethical problems arise. This most basic of all online ethical puzzles dates back to Plato's famous "parable of the ring", which requires that if one has the ability to become invisible and thus escape with anything, would it be right to use the ability?