What is the debate about stem cells?
The
debate on stem cells is surrounded by scientific, religious, ethical and political discussion. Research has grown to include the use of stem cells to repair damaged parts of the human body and find drugs for fatal disease. Since some of these cells are extracted from artificially produced human embryos, but there is a division of ethics and morality involvement in this practice. Stem cells
have the ability to repair and restore. Under the correct conditions, these cells may develop or divide into new cells with special functions. The three main categories of stem cells are adult stem cells, embryonic stem cells and embryonic "fetal" cells. The last type is less common than the other two types in terms of their use for research. Special features of stem cells are considered a potential path to find drugs for various diseases such as cancer, Parkinson's disease or paralysis of spinal cord injury. What once was a terminal disease can be curableStem cells can be used to find drugs.
Despite these potential benefits, stem cells cause ethical concerns. Most of the ethical debate on stem cell research is based on the use of embryonic stem cells. The question is whether it is ethical to use these stem cells that are a potential life to maintain another's life. Some religious denomination was particularly loud in conviction of practice and claimed that all forms of human life should be protected. Politicians often founded their election campaigns on their proposed plans on this topic.
The role of the government was also a point of discussion in the debate on stem cells. This type of research can be expensive. Opponents of stem cell experiments protest against government support because they claim that the state gives money to destroy human life. Private research facilities are also sometimes scrutinized and called to be closed. In someHowever, countries are considered completely legal.
Most of the debate on stem cells are related to the question of which phase of development is calculated as human life. Some insist that life begins directly at conception, or when the sperm enters the egg, and from this advantageous point this embryos are considered life. As a result, this party considers the use of embryonic stem cells as unethical. The opposite view claims that embryos are not human until they cannot exist independently outside the mother's womb. As a result, this party considers the debate to use stem cells to treat the disease. Among them, of course, there are many opinions.