What is more efficient: solar or geothermal force?

The discussion of the efficiency of solar or geothermal forces must look at many different aspects, so this question does not mean as black and white as it can appear at first sight. Efficiency should be defined first. Secondly, local conditions should be taken into account. Thirdly, it is necessary to take into account energy and settings. This latest category will also include whether the efficiency is in terms of use for home or for a commercial environment. Solar panels, even the best on the market, can only transfer a small percentage of their energy to electricity, often 20% or less. Geothermal force may not offer any better solution. In fact, geothermal energy is not used at all to produce electricity for individual houses. For the use of geothermal production it is necessary to use very hot temperatures nearby. The conditions for this type of generation are only available in a few places on the planet, such as Iceland, and once the source that is tapped, the general is used to secure the entire community. AverageThe efficiency of geothermal power plants is approximately 16%, which is comparable to solar forms of energy.

efficiency can be defined as a ratio. On the one hand, you have an energy input and on the other you have an energy output. To be useful, whether it is solar or geothermal, it must be transformed. For example, the furnace must take the energy it receives and convert it to heat. During this conversion, a process known as entropy occurs, which simply means that the energy potential is less than what existed in its original state. This is also known as the second law of thermodynamics. Entropy is considered to be expensive, simply because the process creation is more practical to use energy.

In most cases, while energy efficiency will result in lower energy accounts for individuals, it may not always be the case of solar or geothermal energy. Most importantIn both cases, the costs are installed. Equipment and installations for both can be somewhat expensive. Also, the inputs may not be the same in all areas. For example, it may be possible to have a very effective solar system that is able to convert most of the solar energy into useful electricity or other forms of energy, but if there is no direct sunlight, then the most effective system in the world will do nothing good.

When considering solar or geothermal, the location is so important. Of course, geothermal energy is available to some extent. The drilling process to obtain geothermal energy may not be easy, depending on the ground conditions. This could lead to further expenditures. So even though this technique can be very energy -effective, it may not be very cost -effective.

IN OTHER LANGUAGES

Was this article helpful? Thanks for the feedback Thanks for the feedback

How can we help? How can we help?