What is the guilt of associations?

Association's guilt is a form of association deception in which someone makes conclusions using the assumptions based on the qualities of people, thoughts and things that are really not related. For example, you could say, "People walk on two legs, the bears walk on two legs, so bears are people." This extreme example of the guilt of associations shows how this particular cognitive illusion works, but is usually much softer than this. The second type of association deception is the honor of associations in which someone makes the prerequisites about positive qualities, like "any friend Jane is my friend."

As well as other cognitive pre -braces, the guilt of the associations is designed to help people work in the world by allowing them to make quick judgments. Sometimes it can be a good thing, because cognitive bias can allow people to interpret information quickly and sometimes surprisingly accurately. In other cases, cognitive bias will be in the way of evaruting information and can lead people to logical traps. OnAn example of politicians could say: "My opponent was seen in the company of a radical activist, so my opponent is also a radical activist." The game on emotions often contain symbols that everyone is known, such as Hitler as a symbol of evil in the argument as "Hitler supported euthanasia, so Eutanasia must be evil". People can also use the honor of the Association in Rhetoric.

In the heart of the discussion, it is sometimes difficult to capture the guilt of associations, especially if it is well deployed. People often use associations in an effort to cause people to reject arguments, as "someone who does not like this argument, so the argument must be bad" people who believe the argument, like "the political organization you support, is behind this initiative, so the initiative must be healthy." The guilt of associations is often used as a form of a red sequence to avert someone from the real argument meat.

This concept will appearin a series of circumstances. In legal cases, for example, lawyers often try to manipulate the jury with the guilt or honor of the association, as well as politicians, as well as the citizens in support or contradictory causes with the association errors. Many people find themselves regularly to use association mistakes, do everything from persuading a child to eat vegetables ("your favorite superhero her carrots, so she must be fine") to argue with a friend about politics ("Did you know that your candidate accepted financing from such and certain organizations?").