What are the primary delivery methods for nuclear weapons?

nuclear weapons are probably the most destructive weapons the world has ever seen. They are strong enough to provide any side of a decisive advantage if they are used in sufficient AS with sufficient delivery. For this reason, nuclear states - the United States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, India, Pakistian and Israel - are reluctant to give up. If a nuclear war broke out, what delivery methods would be used? The schoolchildren question, but it is worth considering for geopolitical consequences. The most obvious is mounted on the rocket. All nuclear states have at least ballistic missiles intermediates (3,300 - 5,500 km) and most of them have intercontinental ballistic missiles (larger than 5,500 km). These missiles would be fired either from military foundations or submarines. Submarines offer the deadliest option to attack because they are very worship and are less prone to the first strike than a stationary rocket bay. If it wasn't for submarines, in fact could beIt is possible to defeat a nuclear country with a nuclear first strike, simply by nuccing all its rocket bays.

Another delivery option for nuclear weapons would be to use bombers of high altitudes such as B-2. This is the possibility that has been used for nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the last weeks of World War II. Today, bombers are very worshiped and fly at high altitudes. They are probably deployed to fly in continuous circles over the world's oceans at all times - we do not know. This would give them the advantage that they could avoid the first strike attacks. The United States maintains various bases on isolated islands around the world to give the nation a potential lead in the deployment of nuclear weapons in the case. One bomber B-2 can hold 16 nuclear weapons.

Other deployment methods for nuclear weapons would be specific to dIvadlo, which were designed to be deployed by more or less conventional forces in the heat of intensive war. This brings us to two other deployment methods - conventional cruise missiles and mortar. These "tactical nuclear weapons" would have less yield than large bombs placed on missiles or bombers and would be designed to be used against incoming enemy forces. During the Cold War, many US units equipped with nuclear mortar were placed in Germany, ready to attack the Soviets if they attacked Europe. Today, Malta's approach was largely discarded in favor of more sophisticated and long -term delivery systems.

IN OTHER LANGUAGES

Was this article helpful? Thanks for the feedback Thanks for the feedback

How can we help? How can we help?