What is pseudo -science?
Pseudo -science is a set of knowledge that represents a veneer of scientific respect that does not hold under control. The term "pseudo -science" should be derogatory; You can also hear terms as "alternative science" or "unhealthy science" used to refer to such fields. It is very important to learn to distinguish real science from pseudo -science. This means that the pseudo -science statement cannot be tested and does not follow the logical order. Many scientific concepts cannot be tested with existing equipment, but the agents of such theories can provide solid information that supports their hypotheses, and these creators also welcome criticism and honorary analysis. Pseudo -scientific support has no scientific support and cannot be tested. The first is a lack of testability and independent confirmation. Real scientists are always pleased to share the data they have used to reach their conclusions and welcome independent testing and criticism of their work, and the primary tool to prove theory rather than seeking evidence. The Pseudo -science community refuses to refuse and prefers to find evidence, toTeré strengthens a specific statement and is not open to control or discussion.
It is also common to see pseudo -science accompanied by spectacular languages and claims that are strongly exaggerated. The misleading language is often used in a pseudo -scientific argument and the author can argue which is based on ignorance or assuming that the reader is unconscious. Difficult demands and arguments are also common, along with a generally poor feeling of organization and thinking.
Research used to support pseudo -science usually very sloppy, which means that it cannot be verified or repeated. In addition, pseudo -science is usually accompanied by a general lack of progression and is often highly personalized. When people raise valid questions or criticism, they are accused of personal attacks, coverage or conspiracy. This hostile approach to criticism may be the abolition of pseudo -scientists, even if their claims could have potentially a certain PLATV if they were empirically tested.
Many professional scientists consider pseudo -scientists very harmful, except irritating. Every year, consumers spend a large amount of money on pseudo -science and believe that spectacular claims of companies that try to make profits, and pseudo -science can infiltrate society at an alarming level. Suddenly, for example, people really believed in the practice of frenology, which involves exploring the bumps on someone's head to determine its inner nature.