What are the superior goals?
Superordinary goals are goals that people who normally work in opposition to each other can connect because cooperation is essential for mutual survival. The idea that antagonists can become cooperating in some situations is playing a key role in some organizational thinking and interventions to make groups cooperate with each other. Research of the milestone in this area occurred in the 1950s under the supervision of psychologist Muzafer Sherif, who conducted a number of studies involving young boys in the summer camp. Then the scientists changed the variables so that the boys put it in a position to cooperate on activities such as restoring their water supply after "vandals" damaged him. In this famous "Lobber's Cave", Sherif closed the fact that the boys could work together when the need to achieve superiors prevailed over their opponent's relationship.
The truth of the sherif study is somewhat more complicated than it is originally mentioned, and it plays DAn important role in understanding how superior goals actually work. In fact, Sherif conducted three studies, but only one had a satisfactory result where the boys cooperated to solve the problem. In one study, entities actually turned to scientists to express their frustration, which is not an unusual situation in the experiments of social psychology.
StudiesSherifs have shown that external pressures can affect the way the groups solve superior goals. The scientists themselves were a variable in the study and changed the result. Studies also illustrate the role that bias can play in the study. Scientists obviously want to achieve an abrasive goal and can unconsciously adjust the variables in the study to get there. This is one of the reasons why many experiments use blinding and blinding in their design, if possible, to reduce the influence of observers.
Though Sherif's studies may have been wrong, it seems to be basic forEdstations about superiors are healthy. Research of the intergroup conflict supports the idea that groups as well as individual members influenced by group thinking can connect with a common goal. For example, the United States and Russia have joined in World War II, although they have subtle diplomatic relations. Both nations have decided that their personal conflicts are less important than the goal of defeating the forces of the axis.