What is the global evaluation of functioning?
Global evaluation of functioning (GAF) is a section of mental health of the section to discuss the ability of the patient to cope with the tasks of everyday life. Includes a score between one and 100; This ranges from severe damage that suggests that the patient may be a serious risk of self -harm to high -functioning patients who seem to have no symptoms externally. When evaluating a patient with suspicious mental health problems, global evaluation can provide a useful metric for assessment. The scale is objective, which is useful for comparison in the future and discussion with other care providers.
Care providers examine how well patients work along three different axes. The first is social. In the global evaluation of functioning, the practitioners want to know whether patients regularly communicate with friends and family. This evaluation may include a discussion of what types of social activities the patient has recently been involved in and does a braid for fun. Various social actsVits and diverse friendships can lead to a higher score.
The second area of interest is work and school functioning depending on the patient's age. If the patient goes to school or has a job, the care provider wants to know how well the patient works in these environments. Patients who have difficulty completing tasks do not work with people at school or work or fight understanding instructions, gain a lower score. Patients who are reliable and trusting people who work or learn with them will get a higher score.
Psychological functioning is another problem of global evaluation of functioning. This includes the level of care for the patient. Patients who cannot bathe, dress and eat are a reason for concern. Similarly, in patients who do not speak, they are highly fighter or show signs of extreme emotional distribution. On the other hand, relaxed, calm and friendly paThe cient gets a higher score.
In the global evaluation of the functioning of the care providers, they throw away problems created by environmental and situational factors, as this could unfairly affect the score. For example, a child with learning disabilities is expected to fight school tasks. Poor grades would not necessarily be a sign of declining function. Similarly, the homeless may not be able to bathe regularly, but it does not necessarily have to be an indicator of bad skills of self -care.
If the patient has an extremely low score, the care provider may recommend immediate intervention to ensure treatment. A mild score may indicate the need for therapy and other measures to help the patient, but do not indicate that there is an immediate risk of danger to the patient or others. The high score shows that the patient is doing well in treatment or does not need care for mental health.