What is the prisoner's dilemma?

The prisoner's dilemma is a concept in the theory of games used to illustrate various situations. The concept is also sometimes used in fields such as psychology and philosophy when people want to explore why people act in a way they do it. Credit for the development of prison dilemma is generally given by a pair of scientists Rand, Merrill Flood and Melvin Dresher who worked in the 1950s. Albert W. Tucker improved this idea and baptized the concept of "prison dilemma".

The prisoner of the dilemma is presented as a situation involving two prisoners A and B, who are taken into custody for a crime. The police are aware that the evidence is insufficient, so the prisoners are separated and approached individually. Every prisoner is said to speak and turn the other prisoner, while this prisoner is silent, speaking prisoner liberated while the silent prisoner will make a prison. If both prisoners speak, they will not worry about prison, even if the punishment would be shorter than for the prisoners who were silent while another spoke, and if both prisoners are silent, each tower will benat a very short imprisonment.

Given the way in which the prisoner's dilemma is set up, people quickly concluded that the defect and turn of the other prisoner were the best way to respond to the situation. By silent, the prisoner risks that he will be hit by a long sentence, while the second prisoner walks. The prisoner may hope that the second prisoner is silent, in which case he will be liberated. Of course, when both prisoners speak, they both get some time in prison, but the risk of staying quiet is perceived much greater than the risk of speaking.

As an experiment with the idea, the prisoner's dilemma is very interesting, and some psychology courses play a real version that shows students how it works. He plays the idea that people caught in demanding situations usually try to guess what other people will do. In the case of a prisoner's dilemma, the prisoners find themselves and wonder if the second prisoner will cooperate and remain silent or decide to betrayIT in the hope of walking for free.

6 The prisoner may also assume that the partner reached the same conclusion, in such a case, to avoid an even longer prison sentence, becomes vital and loses both prisoners.

Many people use the prisoner's dilemma to show how the situations can escalate with a number of seemingly rational possibilities. For example, people stuck in heavy traffic often decide to take selfish events in the hope of getting in advance rather than working with The Collective. As a result, Gridck often appears, and all lost in the situation.