What is the mapping of the results?

Result mapping is access to planning, implementation and evaluation of development projects. Emphasis is placed on the overall effect of the project on the community over time. This is, unlike traditional methods, which usually examine the impact on the primary goal only for the duration of the project. The results of mapping try to document changes in the behavior of the community in an effort to support those that support the intention of the program for a long time. This methodology was an advanced International Research Center for Development (IDRC), Canadian organization for economic and social development.

changes in the behavior of border partners, individuals and groups that are directly involved in the project are called results. Examination of results allows training and allocation of resources adapted to the context of the community. The behavior of those who are directly involved in the project can change the behavior of the less directly involved, etc. Matice. Mapping results provide and evaluate the tools for the evaluation of these changes. Acknowledges that a sustainable change involves the interplay ofSettles unique to the project and community.

The deliberate design is the first phase of mapping the results. Border partners are identified and usually bring to the process at this point. The overall project vision is defined and the results necessary to meet this vision are identified. It is considered how the project will be implemented to facilitate these results.

In the second phase, result and monitoring of performance, the project action is documented in relation to the progress of border partners towards the set goals. These are changes in behavior that can be associated with the project, albeit not necessarily directly caused by its actions. Comparison with a set of progress brands that have been defined in the earlier stage of the design allows feedback and adaptation to the ongoing project management process.

Assessment planning is the third phase of mapping results where the criteria for assessing the implementation of the project is consideredh goals. This usually includes the formulation of the ideal, the best case and the probable set of possible results. Since the program's action may not be a close cause of positive changes, the methodology used could develop during the project.

In the mapping of the results, the success is a sustainable progress caused by changes in border partners' behavior. Changes may not be directly associated with project actions, but the project will always be a catalyst for this change. This approach is often used in conjunction with the methodology of traditional evaluation, such as project cycle control (PCM) or logical framework (LFA). These methods emphasize a thorough control of the project itself in terms of quality and implementation efficiency.