How can I become a Supreme Court judge?

If the US Supreme Court is unoccupied, it can only be fulfilled by the appointment of the President of the United States with the consent of the Senate. There is no requirement, constitutional or otherwise that the nominee has experience as a judge or even as a lawyer to become a judge of the Supreme Court, although of 111 in American history, only 11 do not participate in the Faculty of Law and most of them were in the 18th and 19th centuries when the law did not require law. Of the best schools in the US, Harvard Law School has seen the most graduates & Emdash; 14 & Emdash; Continue to become the Supreme Court judge, while Yale Law School sent 10 of its students to the Supreme Court and Columbia Law School boasts seven graduates who have become the Supreme Court judges.

Despite the fact that there are no formal requirements for the nominated court to become a pre -prepared judge, it is a preliminary appointment. The President's Staff will explore the potential nominated as far as possible in an effort to reveal andevaluate any potentially harmful information, whether from a professional career or a candidate's personal life. The President will also personally talk about candidates. Once nominated, he is obliged to fill in the exhaustive questionnaire by the Senate Committee for the Judicial, which will organize hearing about the nomination before it forwards it to the entire Senate for a ratification vote.

Judicial experience meant the career of many of those who have become the Supreme Court judge, but whether such experience helps ratify the nominated is questionable. Within the ratification process, the nominee will testify to the Judicial Committee on what can be best considered a very public job interview. The Committee will carry out an exhaustive investigation of the nominee 'life and any judicial activity will be examined slightly with the eye to reveal any distortion or ideology that could cause controversy.

for example, continuouslyThe controversial problem in the United States is an abortion, and during the ratification process, senators seek to find out how the nominated votes would vote in the case of abortion if it reached the Supreme Court. The nominated parts are constantly refusing to answer specifically to any questions that try to find out how they will vote on a particular set of circumstances, which insists that they do so, it should endanger their impartiality, if such a case actually arises and thus endanger the integrity of the trial. However, if the candidate ever sat as a judge in the case of abortion, the potential to one side or the other seeking to use this case and the position of nominated in it may be sufficient reasons for withdrawing or offering it to someone else in a fi -place.

Therefore, someone who wants to become a judge of the Supreme Court should first acquire a legal title from leading legal schools and then pursue a career without controversy in the hope that he is abandoned afterPresident's pursuit and admiration without causing too many senators.

IN OTHER LANGUAGES

Was this article helpful? Thanks for the feedback Thanks for the feedback

How can we help? How can we help?