Does the anonymity of the Internet allow people to be more average?

The Internet community offers users a number of stores to express their personal opinions and ideas, from chat rooms to messages that comment on sending forms. Many of these interactive websites encourage or even require participants to remain anonymous or create alternative identities. The anonymity of the Internet can provide users' level in the real world, but can also allow certain participants to become much more aggressive or average than it would be without an anonymity. Many people believe that because the person cannot be easily identified, an anonymous commentator feels free to be much more average than he would be otherwise. The same anonymity may encourage others to ignore the label and disclose harmful or deliberately inflammations of the message for the only purpose of injury to other posters or participants in the chat room. These average spiritual or apparently offensive Internet users are often known as trolls In the web community and moderators of the website, they spend most of the time online lubrication of offensive messages and suspending accounts of those who leave them.

A similar phenomenon as trolling may include anonymous posters that are caught in controversial or controversial fibers. The original topic of the discussion is often replaced by personal insults, obscene reactions and ad hominem attacks. These so -called "Flame Wars" or "Flaming" could largely be driven by the anonymity of this experience, because a similarly warmed discussion in real life among identifiable people would most likely not accumulate to this level without external intervention. For most people, it is much easier to ventilate the anger of the frustration of an anonymous troll chat room than it would be to express the same feelings on a controversial collaborator in the real world.

what prevents many people from expressing intense emotions such as angerIn real life frustration, it is the fact that they are known entities in a surprisingly small world. The anonymity of the Internet basically records conditions for all participants, which could seize some users to express the darker parties of their personalities in a way that would be unthinkable in real life. The ability to publish angry or average thoughts without tangible consequences could prove to be too temptation for certain people. Although it has been said that anonymity does not necessarily support significance or anger, it allows users with capacity for strong emotions more easily and with less regard to the consequences of their actions.