What is the network neutrality?
network neutrality, often shortened to "network neutrality", is a business philosophy that supports the idea that all the content and services that use the network should be treated. Although it applies to any form of network, whether it is a telephone service or a cable TV, the term is most often used to talk about Internet services in which all users have the right to send and receive information packages equally. Within the philosophy of network neutrality, Internet services (ISP), search engines, main online services and other companies cannot limit or filter user access to services provided by competitors.
arguments on support
network neutrality supporters suggest that some government legislation is needed to prevent the dominant Internet. A government agency similar to the Federal Commission for Communication of the United States (FCC) could have the power to oversee the basic network to prevent the creation of "Lobber Barons" that could choke that could suffocateCompetition by checking key points on the Internet transmission network. If any company can control what content is provided or enable some data to travel faster via the Internet than other data, claims that it can suppress opinions that disagree or prevent smaller competitors in business.
neutrality level of conditions for commercial websites and ensuring that small online bookstores still have the opportunity to receive visitors, even if the website is more popular. It prevents the e -mail provider from blocking E -mail from the opponent's provider, as well as a telephone company cannot refuse to handle calls made by another Telco. Also, the network neutrality does not allow large companies to pay to gain its content first or faster than a competitor, which would give him an unfair advantage.
arguments against
opponentsNetwork neutralities often include companies that would be regulated, including cable TV companies, major Internet services and large commercial websites. Some suggest that network neutrality is unnecessary because other network systems are managed by their largest contributors and are still able to function fairly. For example, if ISP has blocked its customers in accessing certain websites, these consumers could change to another service provider; Blocking content, as could be claimed, would cause ISP to be less competitive.
Other critics say that greater government control over an internet basic network could lead to an increase in censorship and invasion of privacy. In some countries where telecommunications networks are largely controlled by the government, content and services have been blocked because they can be used to build the opposition to the ruling party. In addition, they say companies should not be forced to receive or transmit information from the competitionEnts or other websites that they consider inappropriate, which occurred in isolated incidents. If all data must be transmitted neutrally, it could be argued, then ISP could not be legally allowed to block spam e -mail or viruses.
In addition, there are some internet content providers who use services much more bandwidth than others. Since more and more users are approaching video, audio and other content, it puts the entire network under stress. If this site is highly desirable, it can create a narrow profile and slow down all data transmitted to all users. Many Internet services argue that because these providers use most of the bandwidth, it is fair that it pays more; Charging heavy data users more in a graded structure could also enable ISP to improve the entire network, which moves the data of each faster.
cable vs. Wireless Internet
supporters and opponents net neuThe structure sometimes differs in its opinion based on whether the network is connected or wireless. And Wired Network is One That Is Delivered Through Wires, Such as Cable, and Digital Subscriber Line (DSL), Telephone Lines, Or Fiber-to-the-Premises (FTTP). On the other hand, the wireless Internet includes WiFi®, Wimax ™, satellite and mobile broadband. Especially because of a sharp increase in data use on mobile devices, there are some groups that usually support network neutrality, more willing in terms of wireless internet services.
There is a disagreement about whether the wireless Internet - specifically what is accessible on mobile phones - is somehow different from what most people use in their homes or offices. Mobile Internet providers often claim that if they cannot enforce a certain level of control over their networks, they will be forced to increase their prices to make enough money to be profitable. They also suggest that TZDE will be less motivation to improve theirNetwork or development of new technologies if they cannot benefit from them.
regulation
Since 2012, there has been no law in the United States that promotes network neutrality, although there is an informal organization to comply with user rights. Japan and some European countries have Internet access laws based on the network neutrality principle. In some cases, companies can block more services or charge some content providers more, but there are instructions for transparency requiring these companies to tell their customers about any data prioritization, bandwidth, or other methods used by ISPs to check on the network.