What is a realistic conflict theory?

Realistic conflict theory of conflicts assumes that groups tend to have more friction when they compete in the competition of sources and work together more if they feel solidarity or have united goals. It is a social psychological concept and is assumed that it partially explains how prejudices develop. The most famous example of this theory was explored in an experiment called the Lobber Cave, carried out by Carolyn and Muzaper Sherif in the 1950s. Since then, other social psychologists have evaluated several aspects of this concept and how it affects group interactions in many ways.

Numerous examples of realistic conflict theory in action exist in the waves of immigration to the United States. When a new group of immigrants from a particular ethnic environment arrived in large numbers, members of the group often encountered deep prejudices because they were considered competitors for resources such as jobs. Over time, this discriminationzing would be singingT, but it could be ruled if the group was assumed that it was a permanent threat. For example, Japanese immigrants faced extreme prejudices and internment during World War II, and many people of Arab origin were discriminated against after terrorist attacks on the USA 11 September 2001.

There are also many historical cases where groups have worked and created greater ties. Building trade unions often combined immigrants of many groups, which were previously characterized by high conflict relationships. The association with political parties also created shared goals between different groups.

These examples and many others have led to curiosity about the nature of the conflict between groups. In order for social psychologists Carolyn and Muzaper Sherif to study it, they proposed an experiment called Lobber Tabor with two camps of pre-dining boys. Both groups were not at first to each otherMí and were studied for how they joined and created links in the group.

After a few days, both camps were informed about themselves and a number of activities were introduced to increase friction and competition between the two groups. This has led to an almost immediate expression of group solidarity and discrimination of the intergroup. The growing tension was so deep that the second phase had to be interrupted after a few days.

The third part of a realistic experiment with Sherifs conflict theory was to introduce both groups with shared goals that could only gain cooperation. When the groups began to work together, shared recognition and solidarity developed. At the end of the study, strong ties have grown between the two camps.

SHERIFS, which seem to confirm the realistic theory of conflicts, many other studies have taken place. In addition, some research has shown that the conflict does not necessarily have to real. Perceived competition for resources, whether there is real competition, may be enough to cause significant friction mEzi groups.

Realistic conflict theory can partially explain the voltage and discrimination of the group. It is also important to realize that it is a solution to conflicts between groups. Identifying common objectives can begin to eliminate some discrimination and support greater intergroup harmony.