What is a peanut butter approach?

The term of peanut butter approach reflects the idea that the company will use the same tactics on all aspects of the company. For example, the company may have to reduce 10% of its workforce. Depending on the concept of peanut butter access, the workforce would decrease evenly between different departments. Managers would be equally likely to be released as ordinary employees and any department, productive or not, would lose 10% of their workers.

If a person made a sandwich with peanut butter, it can be careful about the bread spread evenly through peanut butter. After all, it is more pleasant to eat a sandwich if there is a peanut butter in every bit. This idea was applied to business and the idea of ​​spreading something uniform in all areas has signed up for the name "peanut butter". A company that simply reduces 10% of its workforce without considering that some departments may need more workers for greater productivity may be a mistake. PlaceIn order to expand the layout of the dismissal evenly through the company, business experts often advocate the evaluation of the individual needs of each department. That would be the opposite of peanut butter approach.

Another way to mention the access of peanut butter in business is when companies give an increase. Instead of setting an increase in the system based on merit, some companies provide the same percentage of all employees. This may have unfortunate consequences because it can reward employees who do not have to deserve an increase and do not have to encourage employees who have worked very hard to stay in society. Some business experts suggest that at least part of the increase should be directed to employees who deserve them and that the spread increases evenly CAN to be harmful to society.

Of course, peanut butter is not always negative. SometimesThe company will use because it simply makes sense and is fair. In large companies, however, it may be a mistake to think that the same approach will always work for all departments and aspects of business. Instead of this approach, it is possible to understand the needs, productivity and capacities of each department perhaps more advantageous.

Similarly, people can discuss this approach to interviewing government programs, especially those offering tax relief. Some argue that people and businesses are not administered when taxation remains the same for all as if a flat tax. Especially when it comes to things, such as tax reliefs, some believe that government tax relief should have more specific focus on businesses operating in difficult circumstances, or those businesses that achieve something that Bobčans will be.