What is the approach of a logical framework?

The logical framework approach is the project management tool most commonly used in the international environment. This tool provides a number of steps, including phases for plan and designing, implementation and checking and evaluating each project. The framework needs these steps to work with a large project from start to finish. Supervision for each step depends on the number of pages involved in the process and length of the project. Although the logical framework approach provides many advantages, there are disadvantages for management.

The key advantage of the logical framework is the plan and design phase. At these intersections, the participating parties surround the project on each side and ask questions and decrypt the weaknesses in the project. The purpose of these phases is to enable creators to decide the greatest opportunity to collect information. More support allows better decisions, especially if there is a large international project at hand. Alternatives to some projection of this phase may occur aspects of ECT. Implementation

It can be a little slower than other methods. The logical frame of access tends to proceed slowly because each step takes time to check and implement. External factors may also occur during the implementation phase. The creators of decisions, leadership and other parties may have to sign out for project implementation procedures. The need for more individuals here ensures that all project steps have the right implementation procedures based on international parties.

Review and evaluation usually use several ways of communication. The logical framework access to a large extent depends on communication, as distance or geographical restrictions can make it difficult to evaluate projects. Evaluators often use financial metrics or other quantitative tools for the evaluation phase. Plan and design phases last longer within the logical framework approach to ensure proper operation. This also leads to exactlyA more native evaluation using the right metrics, causing greater financial revenues due to a slower implementation process.

For all its perceived benefits, there is no logical framework in terms of business processes or project management as a panacea. One of the significant disadvantages is the disability of the project; Detailed phases of the plan and design can limit companies or companies in project change as soon as they reach a certain point. Analysis of costs and benefits is also a potential disadvantage. If the financial is not relatively high, the company may experience a low return on invested capital. According to this tool, systematic training and development are also essential, which requires more time to develop a company rather than in reality of project implementation.