What are campaign posts?

Campaign contributions generally refer to money that is provided to people who run for a elected office. Most countries and regions or states in these countries have laws that go to who can contribute to the campaign and how much money they can give. In some countries, only individuals can contribute, while businesses or corporations are forbidden to contribute. In the United States, the reform of campaign financing caused such a debate that the US Supreme Court had to decide on the constitutionality of the law.

In most countries, people standing for the Office and their Election Committees are obliged to keep careful records of the campaign contributions. Records usually include not only the amount of the dollar, but also the date the gift was received and who donated. If questions arise regarding the legality of the campaign contribution, these records may be subject to the review of the supervision and court branches in any G time and sometimes without order or summons. The purpose of these regulations is to disable rich and influential individuals or corporations to "buy" yourOwn candidates. The limitation of the amount of money that can be donated by one individual is the hope that no one will be able to obtain an undue influence on the candidate.

In January 2010, the US Supreme Court issued an important decision on "Citizens United". This case eventually forced the Supreme Court to decide to decide on the issue of large corporations and how they can legally donate campaigns. It was announced that the Supreme Court was much divided in this matter, but in the decision 5-4 he eventually stood up with corporations.

The essence of the argument was that the campaign contributions were a violation of the first amendment to the Constitution. This amendment allows freedom of word. The argument was that freedom of expression also included the ability to support and donate an election campaign, without unnecessary restrictions.

Some people believe that the freedom of expression, as stated in the US Constitution, should only applyon individuals, not for corporations. They believe that the Supreme Court's decision actually pollutes American policy. He claims that this decision makes it easier for corporations and richer individuals to use their power and influence to help put into power who are sympathetic to their business needs. Some argue that if financing is left only to individuals, it maintains more equal conditions for all candidates.