What are some common objections to prolonging life?
over the next few decades, advances in biotechnology and nanotechnology will provide us with new and effective therapies for prolonging radical human life. About the last century, the mean life expectancy increases by a quarter of a year by an average of a quarter of a year, and this trend is certainly accelerated in the future. There is a huge financial support for technology that demonstrably extends human life or improves its quality. With the inevitability of better technology against aging, bioconservatives and advocates of life extensions, they began to explore potential problems growing from longer and healthier life. Of course, the most commonly heard in the discussions on extending life is overpopulation. This means that the population will double each time interval. Currently, this interval is about 34 years.
The amount of resources we can accumulate is bounded by three dimensions - which means that our growth in resources is at best a cubic function. If you draw an exponential functionEven versus the cubic function on the graph, you will see that exponential documents always move features that are of enough time. The moral of the story is that even with a short life, organisms are simply designed to reproduce and consume all local sources faster than new sources can be reproduced and consumed. This means that with or without life prolongation, the birth rate must be low enough to avoid resources than we can get more.
People like Leon Kass and Bill McKibben claimed that the prolongation of radical life would eliminate life. Finetiness of Life makes it sense and a clear beginning, in the middle and end. It preserves the necessary social roles of young, middle -aged and older people. On the BBC, Commentator even went so far that he said that the extreme extension of life would destroy Christmas.
oversopulation is a widespread problem. Environmentalists are particularly afraid of humanTraces on our fragile biosphere. The advocates of life prolonges point to declining birth rates around the world and note that because women are better educated and manual work becomes less important, parents focus on quality. They note that we will inevitably have to go to the world in which we reproduce responsibly, and we have only as many children as social infrastructure can support. Improvement of technology would also allow us to better use limited resources and support our expansion into space.
Bioconservatives and environmentalists are not so optimistic. They see renewable energy and popular space travel as far -reaching progress, a solution that will not come until it is too late. Some even say that the "wars" have already begun and we have headed to Irreversibly to Maltus's disaster.
Another common objection is that we would be bored as immortals. Of course there are many people who protest against it and quote hundreds or dOkonce thousands of years of experience they would like to have on the occasion. Some transhumanists see an improvement in news as a solution to boredom. They say that if we were smarter, we could support the wider and more complicated diversity of thoughts and observations that would maintain our interest almost indefinitely.