What was dark blue?

Deep Blue was a supercomputer designed by IBM specifically for chess playing. The computer was distinguished in 1997 by defeating Garry Kaspar, one of the best chess players in the world. Although the deep blue after this retirement match was after this match, the match laid the foundations for the increasingly sophisticated chess computers and programs, and many chess players now use chess software as a tool for learning and practice to keep its games sharp. The resulting computer was named for deep thoughts and jolves in IBM later designed "Deep Blue", melting "deep thoughts" and "big blue", the nickname IBM.The use in modern chess programs. Like other supercomputers, Deep Blue was incredibly powerful for its time, with 1.4 tonnes of hardware to back up the chess program written in C and be able to calculate up to 200 million potential positions every second. Deep Blue saw up to 40 movements or rushed, as they are known in the chess world, forward.

The computer drew a strategy from the extensive record of chess games playing Masters and Grand Masters. With the records of these games, Deep Blue could consider a wide range of possible movements, gamits and strategies that would potentially allow it to respond dynamically to the opponent's movements. Deep Blue has also improved their game by playing several chess champions, while programmers learn from the computer's mistakes.

The first Deep Blue match against Kasparov took place in 1996 and Kasparov won the match. However, the 1997ed Featur match of a significantly updated dark blue and computer integrated adjustments from its experience in the previous match against Kasparov. Deep Blue won the match, took two games directly to Kasparov One and earned another point and a half out of three draws, a total of three and a half to two and a half.

Kasparov later postponed the match on May 11, 1997 against Deep Blue and claimed that the computer showed such a depth of intelligence that people mUseli intervene during the games to help Deep Blue Win. He demanded retaliation that IBM refused, and this problem became a topic of some controversy in chess and computational communities. Some knowledgeable critics of the chess stressed that Kaspar's 1997 match was very conservative and very out of character for him, suggesting that he could win if he played with his usual aggressive, dynamic style.