What is the discussion of subsidies for ethanol?

charging ethanol by many governments, especially the United States, has led to great controversy. In the United States where billions of dollars of taxpayers' money are spent on ethanol subsidies, this controversy has become particularly acrimonial, and there are a number of reasons. Many of them are cooked for a basic quarrel about whether ethanol, especially corn ethanol, is really miraculous, as people say. Dressing of production costs for the production of ethanol, albeit indirectly, and maintains prices artificially low to allow them to determine in accordance with the real market value. Economists who want to see more general promotion of sustainable energy than ethanol.

subsidies for ethanol can also play a role in escalating food prices and in the ongoing debate on food vs. The argument is that the production of crops on food costs more farmers, as these crops are less subsidized and passing prices to consumers. AfterThe grass is also reduced by subsidies to ethanol, according to this argument, because farmers have the motivation to grow crops for ethanol, so they divert fields that were once used for food crops for maize growth. Reducing the offer can cause price increases and even deficiency in some cases.

Ethanol itself is fuel with dubious merit. It requires special handling, including uniquely formulated petrol for fuel mixtures and special transit procedures that can increase it. Also, it does not burn terribly purely and is less energy efficient than gasoline, which means that automotive running per ethanol or a mixture of ethanol/gasoline will have a lower number of mileage. In addition, the generation of ethanol itself is not very energy efficient and, in some cases, fuel for production and transport can cost more energy than it produces.

Critics of subsidies for ethanol claim that government funds should focus on supporting truly renewable and innovative Ener sourcesGIE than to be spent on the fuel of dubious value. Maintaining subsidies for ethanol is considered unnecessary according to this argument. It seems that the selection where funds target is more advantageous in the long run, although newer technologies are not immediately successful.