What are Kantian Etics?

Cantian ethics is based on Immanuel Kant's morality theory, a philosopher from the 18th century. The ethical system proposed by Kant remains an impact on this day, although it is far from generally accepted. Cantian ethics contains several main principles, although his work mostly shrinks on the idea that certain principles are naturally moral and that a moral person or society must observe these categorical imperatives in all situations. Critics tend to indicate that the cantian ethics simplifies ethical decisions and indicate that the exclusion of all human emotions in favor of rational adherence to certain principles is neither possible nor desirable.

One of the main cornerstones of Cantian ethics is the idea that it is the will of the person, not necessarily the consequences that make action moral or not. If one does something of the meaning of moral law, then his actions have a moral value. According to Kant, this means that if person is taking care of his child's belief that childcare is an important dutyí, acts ethically. However, if one cares for a child simply because he loves a child, this action is more of a tendency than duty and in fact moral value.

The way someone can know what the moral law is, according to Kant, requires testing the principle against the system to see if it holds. An example of the principle known to Kant as Maxim could be that if Joe is poor, Joe will rob someone else to get money. To test this maximum for morality, it must first be generalized, as in: any person who is poor should rob someone else to get money. Kantian ETICS claims that this maximum will disintegrate at this point, because if everyone was involved in an uncontrollable robbery, fit anything. If the maximum fails to generalize, it cannot be used as a categorical imperative or internal moral law and should not be used.

If the maximum stands on tEst generalization may still fail in the second test that asks whether a person would like or generalize the reality. The famous example used by Kant to explain this concept is called the argument Bad Samaritan, which suggests that while society might be where no one helped a neighbor in extreme need, most people would not be this situation because no one would help them if they were extreme. According to Kantian Ethics, it should not be one of the maximum that the person would not be universal.

Criticism of Kant's principle of categorical imperatives usually finds that the moral law must be universal and does not allow any exceptions. For example, Kant claims that murder is generally bad. Critics say that this principle suggests that the person should allow his wife to be defeated and raped before murdering his attacker. Kant's theory of imperatives, albeit quite rational, seems to be a utopian concept that cannot be fully realized in complex society.

dThe rungent principle of Cantian ethics suggests that people are naturally valuable and should not be used or treated as a means of target. Although this theory may seem obvious, it was definitely not in the 18th century. Kant emphasized other people's rationality, a revolutionary concept in a world of slavery, suppress minorities and carefully protected against women's rights.