Scientists know how to clone people?
It would be accurate to say that many scientists understand the process needed to clon the people, but very little would try to perform experiments in full scale to improve this process. During the current cloning procedures of animals, the results are much more negative than positive, with some experts indicating only 1 or 2 successes for every 100 attempts. If scientists try to clone people based on the current level of success, their laboratories would most likely be closed and scientists could be tried for crimes against humanity. It could be a decade before cloning technology improves enough to even consider the feasible way of cloning people.
Most cloning today is not a reproductive or replication variety, such as the cloned sheep mentioned Dolly. This procedure requires complete removal of the core of the donor egg and the implantation of DNA and other materials from the animal to clone. That would also be the eh scientists of the method by pThey used to clone people if such a process was considered ethical. Most cloning processes that are used today are combined only by a haircut of genetic coding into cells prepared for its acceptance. When this cell is divided, cloned genetic information is reproduced again and re -reproduced.
There are still a number of serious ethical, moral and technical problems that should be resolved than could be allowed to clon people in the same sense as cloned sheep or endangered species by any renowned scientist. For example, the reproductive form of cloning has an unacceptably high failure rate in its current state of development. Even if the human egg cell survived the initial streaming process and adopted a foreign DNA, the embryo would still threaten serious genetic deformities or a compromised immune system. Many cloned animals have shortened the life and many serious heapromels today.Before the scientist could clone people, he would have to take responsibility for any negative results caused by the procedure.
Before scientists could clone for reproductive or replication purposes, there would also be a question of motivation. A cloned person might not necessarily be an identical genetic twin of the donor, even if he could share many of the same physical qualities. Scientists working in medical fields, such as reproduction or genetic medical research, could not just clone people to replace the deceased child or to create a suitable donor for a child suffering from a genetic disorder or condition. The cloning of people from such self -service or emotional reasons would be considered highly unethical.
Maybe one day the technology will be necessary to clon people to a point where cloning can be feasible on request. There will still be serious ethical and moral problems facing scientists who explore it, so human cloning can remain another example, inwhich science for new technology far surpasses the moral, ethical and professional problems it eventually creates.