What are the different types of direct evidence?
by law, direct proof is what proves or refutes innocence without required to derive by the judge or jury. There are several different types of direct evidence, including witnesses, sound or video recordings and documentation. Some forms of evidence, such as DNA samples, can only be considered as direct evidence in some cases.
The testimony of eyewitnesses is one of the most common types of direct evidence. If a witness sees or hears a crime, the events can combine with the best abilities. In general, the courts assume that a witness is an objective party that can be relying on the fact that the events relate as they occurred without requiring the court to conclude what happened. The visual testimony of the witness, such as watching the defendant's shooting of the victim, is usually considered to be the most reliable form of direct evidence. If the witness hears only a shot, he cannot directly testify who shot a weapon, and therefore giving may be circumstances rather than direct evidence.
Although testimony is one of the most commonly used types of direct evidence, it is not always fully reliable. Witnesses may have distortion that may affect their testimony, or may have difficulty remembering the exact sequence of events due to stress or shock. Judges and juries must consider how to consider direct evidence of eyewitnesses, judges and jury.
More reliable forms of direct evidence include sound and video recordings. Since the tape or video camera cannot have bias, the objectivity of this type of evidence is usually unquestionable. Tracking tapes, interception recordings, and even mobile phone recordings can serve as a direct form of objective evidence that shows what actually happened during crime. In some cases, however, recordings may be inadmissible as evidence if they are obtained illegally; For example, in California is sometimes illegal to record a person befrom his consciousness. In order to ensure that records can be used, lawyers and legal officials must be careful not to comply with all valid laws of evidence.
Documentation used as direct evidence can include e -maily, letters or diary items. They are generally considered direct if they contain real crime, such as e -mail, which includes the threats of death. If the perpetrator admits his crimes through written correspondence or witness describes a written account, he may also be considered a form of factual evidence.
In the case of paternity, DNA may serve as a form of direct and factual evidence. DNA is widely considered to be a reliable method of establishing paternity and therefore does not only disclose that the child is associated with the blood or mother, but serves as objective evidence of reality. Vmnoho criminal cases, DNA evidence, such as fingerprints or blood matches, is considered indirect. Although it may prove that the person was present at the crime scene,He does not show undeclaibly whether the person has committed the act.