What is the hypothesis of water apes?

The

hypothesis of apement apes, sometimes referred to as the theory of apes or aat, is a dubious theory of paleoanthropology that enjoyed popularity in the 80's and early 90s. The basic idea is that human evolution has been strongly influenced by the presence of water formations and many of our signature characteristics and differences from other primates, such as hairless and bipedism, can be explained by reference to this water station. The Hypothesis of Water Apes "Most vocal petitioners are Elaine Morgan, a television playwright and feminist writer. Although the theory was eventually rejected by the paleoanthropological community, aware of the reasons why it was refuted can help us more about the nature of the evolutionary process. The first argument for the idea of ​​water apes comes from hairless. Removing our dense primrate hair makes it easy to swim and faster drying when the water protruding. Another argument dates back. It is said that the hovering properties of water would make it easierIncremental development from quadrupedalism to bipedalism. Another argument comes from checking over our breathing. We can deliberately control our breathing as many water and semi -published creatures, but unlike other land creatures.

There are many other unofficial arguments for the hypothesis of apes. Several of them are our excess fat, perpendicular nostrils, the ability of infants to hold your breath and swim from birth, greater fish nutrition in relation to grounding animals and personal sex, as with dolphins, are cited as possible evidence of the impact of the aquatic environment over our evolution.

There are many arguments against the hypothesis of water apes. The most visible is that the arguments for their benefit tend to be vague, offer several testable predictions and change their prerequisite based on the feature they are trying to argue, related to the water past. TheoryE since the 1950s, when the theory was originally introduced, has not changed significantly.

Another argument is that most of the body features attributed to the development of water in the apes of apes is not either truly exclusive to aquatic animals, or their development can be explained by other means. For example, many species of neaquatic apes are able to go through at least temporarily, which doubts the idea that water is necessary to facilitate permanent bipedalism. Our hairless is probably the result of a long distance walk and their appropriate need for more efficient heat distraction. Our excess fat is common in all animals without natural predators and a significant amount of food. None of this is necessary to explain.

Sometimes theories teach us even more about science when Wrong is right. Paleoanthropologists are often studied as a way of evolutionary theory of falsified and as accessible to scientific testing as a way of water apes.