What are the advantages and disadvantages of NGOs?
The
NGO (NGO) movement (NGO) to alleviate poverty, environmental protection or human rights advocates will be expanded throughout the developing world and since 2002 it has been estimated that more than 30% of international development aid. While many of the smaller NGOs in this group are considered to be positive, uplifting services to local communities, greater multinational examples of social organizations are susceptible to the same types of endemic corruption as other business entities. NGOs also often support ideologies as the same rights for women who are in direct conflict with the political objectives of local administration.
Another specific restriction of many NGOs that give them unique strength and weakness is their focus on one key aspect of a roofing problem in society. For example, work on providing access to clean water for the poor without solving regulation problems such as industrial contaminationIt may only lead to contact for long -term change. This leads to a conclusion in the circles of development aid, that the success of NGOs in the last 50 years had mixed results, often due to poor supervision and management of their goals.
neglecting the neglect of the effects of humanitarian actions in a wider context, some NGOs have acquired a negative image in the eyes of governments in the countries in which they work. A prominent example is the food crisis that occurred in Niger in 2005. Niger's President Mamadou Tandja accused the international food agency of exaggerating his country's problems and painting is simply, which did not reflect real conditions and needs. The international media portrayed Niger's crisis as suddenly, acute to drum down the support and financing of the services of NGOs, in fact experienced Niger's populations chronic malnutrition that inIt was from the years of lack and rising prices. Such disagreements for the help and real needs that are trying to fulfill are often leading to excessive short -term giving and little attention to chronic conditions that have created the crisis in the first place.
The image of non -profit agencies in the developing world is often one of the agencies overvalued by their efficiency and underestimates damage that they can cause, causing disturbance of natural management mechanisms. Zambia auxiliary assistance in 2002 to avert the perceived opposing famine predicted by the UN, was forbidden by the United States' donor nation due to the fact that donated corn came from genetically modified corn crops. At that time, American NGOs thought that such a Zambian policy was absurd and would lead to millions to death, but Zambia has not experienced famine conditions partly due to a negied food aid by Europe.
If non -governmental organizations are ÚActing in alleviating the crisis or where they work in accordance with government policies, their presence is often welcome, but permanent effects may be minimal. More effort to solve root causes of problems is considered necessary. Independent organizations provide assistance in the Sahel area in the southern desert of Sahara in Africa, which, for example, has been covering the territory of six nations since 1972, but until 2011 the same famine and emergencies have continued.
The key advantages offered by non -governmental organizations are the fact that they evoke more confidence in the local population if they are small and intimately involved in everyday matters than intervention of foreign governments and multinational corporations. They may also have more concentration of grass roots that build sustainability from the ground up if they are properly managed and administered. The key to their effectiveness is the ability to represent the organization of civil society that can work without major racial or ethnic programs. NGOShe eats a great vision of changes, often on a local level, creating a interference tone by promoting their religious and political agendas, but distinguishes which organizations are welcome and which are frowning must be made by the unique basis of the case.