What is so controversial about genetically modified (GM) food?

genetically modified (GM) food caused controversy between scientists, environmentalists and economic activists. GM foods are grown from plants whose genes have been created to change their chemistry or biology for drought resistance, insect infestation, disease and cause the resulting food -rich foods and minerals, larger, tastier or longer.

Biotechnology of genetically modified foods is controversial for opponents who fear the effects on human health and the environment. For example, it wonders what it means using genes of inedible animal or plant species in edible animal or plants, although this resulting food has a higher amount of vitamins or minerals and seems healthier. This is the primary difference between genetically modified food crops and crops that have been selected, such as corn or cattle, for taste, durability or easy maintenance. For example, chemicals in some fish that allows them to diveThe eye in cold water now helps strawberry plants to withstand gentle frosts. The importance or long -term effects of bioengineering have not been completely evaluated, although no risks have been detected yet.

Second, the agriculture of genetically modified foods is for farmers who have touched that growers cannot prevent pollen in transgenic plants that provide GM foods in the spread and fertilization of wild or non -transgenic, counterparts. These opponents draw attention to the damage that could be caused if the tribes of genetically modified species penetrate into the wild and threaten the natural balance of the ecosystem of the plant. Couldn't a hybrid species resist a certain kind of contamination because they were designed without poison? Could they become incapable of reproductions? Bioengineers claim that cross pollination is a negligible risk because pollen must travel after long distance over "ditch" created between genetCky modified crops and other species and there were no such leaks.

International economic concerns caused controversial reactions between advocates for developing economies of nations. When a large society can handle the crops of foods with a large department of research and development, it ensures fantastically successful genetically modified food. Some say that this gives them an unfair advantage over the traditional methods of farmers' cultivation, which in turn creates a long -term dependence on corporation. For example, one society has created rice with more vitamins, greater durability and easy growth. They sell seeds that will not be self -promoted because the plants were infertile, which means that farmers must buy seeds every season. Some believe it creates unnecessary dependence of developing countries on several giant corporations to provide all seeds and herbicides year after year to receive genetically modified food. Others consider this to be a natural expansion of international capitalistThe system that needs careful regulation but has no internal problems.